Closed bl25322 closed 3 years ago
@Kav91 what do you think about this issue? Is it valid to remain on the list?
@tangollama I think we should close it. This would be valuable, but I can't think of a generic/simple way to handle it which would also be somewhat reliable/valuable. Eg. even with trying to do charts to show projected values, say with a different instance type, CPU architecture, threads, burst/non-burstable options are things that could change, which is hard to project.
Summary
While showing this off, a key stakeholder asked "whatever it recommends it should not put him at risk of under deployment".
Desired Behaviour
Could we include what the estimated cpu/memory load would be if an instance is right-sized to a suggested system.
Could we show (for an instance)... timeseries of utilization over xx period of time, and projected utilization over that same period of time if a suggested instance is put in place.
Possible Solution
Additional context
It is great it points on where you can save money but it does not give a gauge of the risk of underdeployment if a change is made.