Closed jpvajda closed 2 years ago
opensource-website-develop
:tada: Your build was successful! See the Deploy preview here.
:clock1: Build time: 4m
Metric | Score |
---|---|
Performance | :large_orange_diamond: 34 |
Accessibility | :large_orange_diamond: 88 |
Best Practices | :green_heart: 93 |
SEO | :large_orange_diamond: 85 |
:link: View full report
This passes all checks now.
Something is up with this build, it's missing most of the projects on the preview build. Running a build locally to see what I can find
No resolution yet, this is what I'm seeing:
develop
branch
gatsby4-upgrade
branch
Okay, I know why but I haven't fixed it yet. We are doing this and need to swap over to using createNodeField
FWIW: when building locally I see this error, which I believe is related to the use of the gatsby-newrelic-plugin
[@] winston-to-newrelic-logs: Error sending log data - Error: Request failed with status code 403
@rudouglas may have some context into the error I am seeing with the build plugin
https://github.com/newrelic-experimental/gatsby-build-newrelic/issues/30
This PR is helpful for the suggestion @aswanson-nr made https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/pull/33715
I made a change to use the createNodeField
but the projects still aren't loading.. 🤔
I tried a different approach with the use of createNodeField
what is interesting is locally I can load all the projects but when viewing the site on the preview build the projects do not load.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically closed because it was a stale issue that had no recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.