Closed jeffalder closed 4 years ago
@jeffalder , I'm not super knowledgeable on containers. There is a dockerfile that someone else was able to successfully create. If the output of that dockerfile is output to dockerhub (for each version change), would that be sufficient to close this ticket? If not, perhaps we can split out these feature requests to their own specific tickets? Or could you otherwise elaborate on what would need to change for you to meet all those requirements?
@cutler-scott-newrelic Yes, outputting the image to dockerhub would work perfectly ... along with documentation on dockerhub about how to run it and the fact that choctaw_hog
is the default.
Just an update: I uploaded a single DockerHub image here: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/wetfeet2000/choctaw_hog and added a bare-bones README how to use it. The plan is to roll out proper documentation and all hogs with v1.0.7. But I was confused by one thing: The DockerHub + GitHub integration didn't allow me to select the rusty-hogs repo and I have no clue why. Is it looking for another file that helps it with the build process?
The rest of the Rusty Hogs have been uploaded to DockerHub. I imagine you may have issues with authentication on Berkshire and Ankamali Hog since their libraries attempt to access the local file system for credential files. I will try and add that as a separate TODO for later.
Summary
Publish images to dockerhub.
Desired Behaviour
I would like to use containers so that: