nextauthjs / next-auth

Authentication for the Web.
https://authjs.dev
ISC License
25.04k stars 3.54k forks source link

Declare module "next-auth/jwt" in next-auth@v5.0.0-beta.22 #12095

Closed ev0clu closed 1 month ago

ev0clu commented 1 month ago

Environment

System:
    OS: Linux 6.8 Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS 24.04.1 LTS (Noble Numbat)
    CPU: (12) x64 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor
    Memory: 18.36 GB / 31.26 GB
    Container: Yes
    Shell: 5.2.21 - /bin/bash
  Binaries:
    Node: 20.18.0 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v20.18.0/bin/node
    npm: 10.8.2 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v20.18.0/bin/npm
  Browsers:
    Brave Browser: 129.1.70.126
  npmPackages:
    @auth/prisma-adapter: ^2.7.2 => 2.7.2 
    next: 14.2.15 => 14.2.15 
    next-auth: ^5.0.0-beta.22 => 5.0.0-beta.22 
    react: ^18 => 18.3.1 

Reproduction URL

https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth-example

Describe the issue

I use 5.0.0-beta.22. and got the following typescript error when I want to declare new module for auth.ts as the example shows in the auth.js repository.

Invalid module name in augmentation, module 'next-auth/jwt' cannot be found.

declare module "next-auth/jwt" {
  interface JWT {
    accessToken?: string
  }
}

image

How to reproduce

I use the auth.js example to config auth.ts. The example code gives me typescript error.

image

Expected behavior

Typescript should recognize the 'next-auth/jwt' module or define it directly with auth module.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

We could not detect a valid reproduction link. Make sure to follow the bug report template carefully.

Why was this issue closed?

To be able to investigate, we need access to a reproduction to identify what triggered the issue. We need a link to a public GitHub repository. Example: (NextAuth.js example repository).

The bug template that you filled out has a section called "Reproduction URL", which is where you should provide the link to the reproduction.

What should I do?

Depending on the reason the issue was closed, you can do the following:

In general, assume that we should not go through a lengthy onboarding process at your company code only to be able to verify an issue.

My repository is private and cannot make it public

In most cases, a private repo will not be a sufficient minimal reproduction, as this codebase might contain a lot of unrelated parts that would make our investigation take longer. Please do not make it public. Instead, create a new repository using the templates above, adding the relevant code to reproduce the issue. Common things to look out for:

I did not open this issue, but it is relevant to me, what can I do to help?

Anyone experiencing the same issue is welcome to provide a minimal reproduction following the above steps by opening a new issue.

I think my reproduction is good enough, why aren't you looking into it quickly?

We look into every issue and monitor open issues for new comments.

However, sometimes we might miss a few due to the popularity/high traffic of the repository. We apologize, and kindly ask you to refrain from tagging core maintainers, as that will usually not result in increased priority.

Upvoting issues to show your interest will help us prioritize and address them as quickly as possible. That said, every issue is important to us, and if an issue gets closed by accident, we encourage you to open a new one linking to the old issue and we will look into it.

Useful Resources