nextauthjs / next-auth

Authentication for the Web.
https://authjs.dev
ISC License
25.04k stars 3.54k forks source link

setup-fw-integration script broken #12303

Closed dowski closed 2 hours ago

dowski commented 2 hours ago

Environment

N/A

Reproduction URL

N/A

Describe the issue

The setup-fw-integration script fails, likely since ab0784a1cef6ed708b4df4d0e4d81cc90df13096.

How to reproduce

Run npm run setup-fw-integration foo or something.

next-auth % pnpm setup-fw-integration foo   

> root@0.0.0 setup-fw-integration /Users/christian/Development/next-auth
> pnpm clean --filter=@auth/frameworks-template && node packages/utils/scripts/setup-fw-integration.js "foo"

> root@0.0.0 clean /Users/christian/Development/next-auth
> turbo run clean --no-cache "--filter=@auth/frameworks-template"

╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│                                                                          │
│                     Update available v2.1.1 ≫ v2.3.2                     │
│    Changelog: https://github.com/vercel/turborepo/releases/tag/v2.3.2    │
│             Run "npx @turbo/codemod@latest update" to update             │
│                                                                          │
│          Follow @turborepo for updates: https://x.com/turborepo          │
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
turbo 2.1.1

• Packages in scope: @auth/frameworks-template
• Running clean in 1 packages
• Remote caching disabled
@auth/frameworks-template:clean: cache bypass, force executing 4ff19a7e27794d60
@auth/frameworks-template:clean: 
@auth/frameworks-template:clean: 
@auth/frameworks-template:clean: > @auth/frameworks-template@0.3.0 clean /Users/christian/Development/next-auth/packages/frameworks-template
@auth/frameworks-template:clean: > rm -rf lib index.* src/lib/providers
@auth/frameworks-template:clean: 

 Tasks:    1 successful, 1 total
Cached:    0 cached, 1 total
  Time:    325ms 

📂 Copying /Users/christian/Development/next-auth/packages/frameworks-template to /Users/christian/Development/next-auth/packages/frameworks-foo
file:///Users/christian/Development/next-auth/packages/utils/scripts/setup-fw-integration.js:66
  ...vercelJson.redirects,
                ^

TypeError: vercelJson.redirects is not iterable
    at file:///Users/christian/Development/next-auth/packages/utils/scripts/setup-fw-integration.js:66:17

Node.js v18.18.0
 ELIFECYCLE  Command failed with exit code 1.

Expected behavior

Script doesn't fail.

github-actions[bot] commented 2 hours ago

We could not detect a valid reproduction link. Make sure to follow the bug report template carefully.

Why was this issue closed?

To be able to investigate, we need access to a reproduction to identify what triggered the issue. We need a link to a public GitHub repository. Example: (NextAuth.js example repository).

The bug template that you filled out has a section called "Reproduction URL", which is where you should provide the link to the reproduction.

What should I do?

Depending on the reason the issue was closed, you can do the following:

In general, assume that we should not go through a lengthy onboarding process at your company code only to be able to verify an issue.

My repository is private and cannot make it public

In most cases, a private repo will not be a sufficient minimal reproduction, as this codebase might contain a lot of unrelated parts that would make our investigation take longer. Please do not make it public. Instead, create a new repository using the templates above, adding the relevant code to reproduce the issue. Common things to look out for:

I did not open this issue, but it is relevant to me, what can I do to help?

Anyone experiencing the same issue is welcome to provide a minimal reproduction following the above steps by opening a new issue.

I think my reproduction is good enough, why aren't you looking into it quickly?

We look into every issue and monitor open issues for new comments.

However, sometimes we might miss a few due to the popularity/high traffic of the repository. We apologize, and kindly ask you to refrain from tagging core maintainers, as that will usually not result in increased priority.

Upvoting issues to show your interest will help us prioritize and address them as quickly as possible. That said, every issue is important to us, and if an issue gets closed by accident, we encourage you to open a new one linking to the old issue and we will look into it.

Useful Resources