Open paradeiser opened 2 years ago
I wonder why this issue doesn't even get tagged / assigned, tho it corrupts calendar-data.
Am I missing something? 🧐
what do you expect?
I hoped for something like: "Thanks, we could reproduce this behavior and this is indeed a bug. We tag it as "1. to develop / fix" (with high priority, as it corrupts user-data)."
What could I expect?
Danke Christoph!
Fair enough. We don't have the resources to reproduce every single report at the moment.
Still present in Calendar app 3.3.1 Nextcloud 24.0.1
This bug makes it dangerous to check the "can edit" option, if a calendar is shared.
Related to https://github.com/nextcloud/calendar/issues/1587.
We had the same issue in Tasks, see https://github.com/nextcloud/tasks/pull/862 and https://github.com/nextcloud/tasks/pull/902. The solution was to treat tasks/events in shared calendars with an access class other than PUBLIC
as read-only. Everything else doesn't make sense and leads to data loss for the owner of the calendar.
I think this should actually be implemented in server (server should refuse any change of events with access class other than PUBLIC
in shared calendars not coming from the owner), but having it in Calendar is a good fix, I think.
I believe it's just a different way of hitting the same issue, but wanted to note that this also occurs if you have an event in a Shared Calendar with Edit enabled and set it's visibility to "When shared show only busy"
I believe it's just a different way of hitting the same issue, but wanted to note that this also occurs if you have an event in a Shared Calendar with Edit enabled and set it's visibility to "When shared show only busy"
Hi !
This issue was also discussed in https://github.com/nextcloud/server/issues/5551
I actually have this situation at the moment: we have a group calendar in which we keep events for the group (everyone has edit rights). My first intuition was that when I create an event and set it to "when shared show only as busy" that it would still be edit/readable by the other group members, but would be shown to people only having view rights only as busy.
To create a private event that also is private, I would actually create it in my own calender (and maybe share that read-only to the group). That IMHO resembles the general approach also in Outlook (though that program has more fine-grained access control that just view vs. edit).
Haven't found any specification so far, but the Davical project has something for them. It talks about how to handle private events (the spec implies that the calendar might be shared as it states "all except [...] user"): https://wiki.davical.org/index.php?title=Features
Steps to reproduce
Expected behavior
I would expect:
Tho, I think this work-flow is contra-intuitive. It also does not reflect the common work-flow of google-calendars.
If a calendar is shared with "can edit" rights, I would expect this user also to see all details for "show as busy for others" events. What sense would it make to be able to edit an event, I don't even know it's title. Then the original title would not be obscured and user B could edit with the original title, hence it would also not be lost for user A. The setting "When shared, show as" should actually state: "When shared to read-only users, show as busy"
One could discuss how to handle "hidden" (class:private) events. Option 1) Don't even show to subscribers with "can edit" rights. Option 2) Also show to "can edit" subscribers and let them actually edit this event too. I personally would prefer option 1. This way you still have a way to entirely hide events from subscribers, even with edit rights. The visibility option would state "When shared, hide this event to everyone"
Actual behaviour
If a subscribing user edits an event set to "show as busy" from another user, the original title is overwritten (to "Busy") also for the original user.
Edit: It breaks all event details, not just the title…
Calendar app version
3.2.0
CalDAV-clients used
NC Webinterface
Browser
Firefox 98
Client operating system
macOS
Server operating system
Linux 5.4.0-100-generic x86_64
Web server
No response
Database engine version
No response
PHP engine version
No response
Nextcloud version
23.0.2
Updated from an older installed version or fresh install
Fresh install
List of activated apps
No response
Nextcloud configuration
No response
Web server error log
No response
Log file
No response
Browser log
No response
Additional info
No response