Open igwill opened 11 months ago
You could just run repeatmasker outside of funannotate and give the masked file to predict and compare. I generally have stopped running masking within funannotate as I end up combining the custom Rmodeler library + set of known repeats for the kingdom. This way I run RepeatMasker in its own conda env and the version of libraries can match its expectation anyways.
Are you using the latest release? 1.8.15, installed via mamba
Describe the bug In stdout, masking seems fine:
However, when looking at mask.log, there are a couple potential issues: this version of numpy (1.24) doesn't have typeDict (I think this might have changed in v 1.12 or so), and this general.working/ dir is not found. Yet, the 'analyzing file' output looks fine? And I'm getting masking levels similar to those reported when RepeatModeler made the custom database on this genome initially.
Does this seem like the masking worked OK in the end?
What command did you issue?
Thanks!