Open MarijaBogdanova opened 6 years ago
Hello, Marija, could you please answer the next questions?
Hello, 1) as I thought that random sampling procedure didn't work for me, I used "all" sampling (every time I tried to use stratified, QGIS crashed, so that didn't work for me either) At some point I set the count of samples to 10 000 and 50 000, and the result was almost the same (no noticeable changes)
2) I will attach some learning curves in the same dropbox folder right away!
Stratified sampling is preferable in case of unbalanced classes. If you use 'all' samples, then ANN might ignore some rare classes/transitions: prediction errors of rare transition don't add much to cumulative error. So I think the most important issue is about QGIS crash. Could you provide more information about it?
I see why stratified is preferable. But 'all' samples worked in case with logistic regression (results attached in new link, I didn't make it up!).
I made some investigations and see two problems:
Have you resolved the issue . If yes i am facing the same problem.
Hello! I seem to have a problem with simulation using ANN transition potential modelling. I have a two land cover maps from 2003 and from 2018 (both integer) and a set of factors (11 factors both integer and float). Problem is - with Logistic regression and WoE I do get more or less desired results (changes are simulated in all land cover classes), but with ANN changes are very limited, sometimes ignoring whole classes. I know it is supposed to 'learn' from past development of land covers. But I think in my case that it ignores the past development of the urban cover, urban sprawl basically, sprawl which continiues to happen and I expected that to show in the simulation for year 2033.
I tried changing the count of samples, count of hidden layers, learning rate, left it training overnight, but all the results are still looking very similar - with very little changes being simulated. What could be the problem? May be something wrong with my inputs? Here is a link to my inputs. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/iudnonedzuc5lrq/AAC8jZ01oJDuLHp24Oco1Ijca?dl=0
there are two inputs for initial and final years (2003/2018_smaller_int), the rest 11 are factors (like distance to roads/, rivers, tehnical infrastructure, schools, bus stops, as well as zoning, population location/count of registered firms)
Would be very thankful if you would try to see where the problem could be.