Closed genehack closed 3 months ago
The requirement of a database
field was a past annoyance of mine. I'm glad to see this change.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 69.54%. Comparing base (
4264701
) to head (f1f05da
). Report is 226 commits behind head on master.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description of proposed changes
Per discussion on #1508 and #1511, the field standardization across records (cf #1510) makes the need to verify a
database
field less important — essentially, if there's ageo_loc_name
field (or a field with the name given in the--location-field
argument), parse it. Otherwise, warn that it's not found.Related issue(s)
1511
1510
1508
1485
Checklist