<doc>
One group like this per component can be recorded For a sample consisting of multiple components.
</doc>
Ignoring the incorrect capitalisation of For (either F should be lower-case or there is a missing full-stop), the description is problematic because it only defines NXsample_component in terms of "components". Beyond stating that a NeXus file should contain either no instances or multiple instances of this group, the description is a semantically null sentence.
Put another way: there is nothing which says what is a component.
Therefore, someone will have a hard time when trying to decide whether their data should be defined with (multiple) NXsample_component groups or just a single NXsample?
The current description of
NXsample_componentisIgnoring the incorrect capitalisation of
For(eitherFshould be lower-case or there is a missing full-stop), the description is problematic because it only definesNXsample_componentin terms of "components". Beyond stating that a NeXus file should contain either no instances or multiple instances of this group, the description is a semantically null sentence.Put another way: there is nothing which says what is a component.
Therefore, someone will have a hard time when trying to decide whether their data should be defined with (multiple) NXsample_component groups or just a single NXsample?