$ node index.js | jq '.result.casts[] | {text: .text, author: {fid: .author.fid, viewer_context: .author.viewer_context}, viewer_context: .viewer_context}'
{
"text": "Whether you're in 'founder mode' or 'manager mode', you need to make sure your marketing team understands your product.\n\nThis will help you 👇 \nhttps://mirror.xyz/cryptotaboo.eth/wq--HTfY22a36LpO_XdVJ-qCj_yzMt73-tZMoDNeuMk",
"author": {
"fid": 308042,
"viewer_context": {
"following": false,
"followed_by": false
}
},
"viewer_context": {
"liked": false,
"recasted": false
}
}
{
"text": "founder mode just turned off...",
"author": {
"fid": 408262,
"viewer_context": {
"following": false,
"followed_by": false
}
},
"viewer_context": {
"liked": false,
"recasted": false
}
}
{
"text": "Yeah this doesn’t feel groundbreaking— founder mode has always been a thing we just didn’t have this name for it. \n\nThere’s also plenty of examples of founders who wouldn’t give up power/micromanage and that also doesn’t work well for scaling. \n\nI would love to see some research/dara that shows what the actual results are for different approaches so if that results for this interest then great!",
"author": {
"fid": 4167,
"viewer_context": {
"following": false,
"followed_by": false
}
},
"viewer_context": {
"liked": false,
"recasted": false
}
}
Example