Extract processed reads

[opetryk]

PR checklist

• [ ] This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
• [ ] If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • [ ] If you've added a new tool - add to the software_versions process and a regex to scrape_software_versions.py
  • [ ] If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • [ ] If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/dualrnaseq branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
• [ ] Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint .).
• [ ] Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker).
• [ ] Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
• [ ] Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
• [ ] CHANGELOG.md is updated.
• [ ] README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

[github-actions[bot]]

Python linting (black) is failing

To keep the code consistent with lots of contributors, we run automated code consistency checks. To fix this CI test, please run:

• Install black: pip install black
• Fix formatting errors in your pipeline: black .

Once you push these changes the test should pass, and you can hide this comment :+1:

We highly recommend setting up Black in your code editor so that this formatting is done automatically on save. Ask about it on Slack for help!

Thanks again for your contribution!