Closed jfy133 closed 7 months ago
Looks very reasonable to me. We should just make sure somehow we don't have the fastas etc somewhere twice.
These are technically there twice :\, but gneome.fasta
twice doesn't work well when trying to stage them together in one directory :grimacing:
Ok I have the two :heavy_check_mark: so proceeding even if it's sarek focused :eyes:
I'm increasingly coming across cases where the current test-data 'organism' structure does not work with metagenomic tools, such as the repeated
genome.fasta
files causing name conflicts.Furthermore, as metagenomics are dealing with multiple organisms, I need combinations of multiple organisms e.g. with taxonomies.
This PR adds a dedicated metagenome folder that provides a space for 'minimal' metagenomes related files of just 2 organisms, including compatible names.
It also updates the README to include missing entries, where I know what they are...