Closed allaway closed 1 month ago
PR Preview Action v1.4.7
:---:
:rocket: Deployed preview to https://nf-osi.github.io/nf-metadata-dictionary/pr-preview/pr-443/
on branch gh-pages
at 2024-05-10 15:22 UTC
Converting this back to draft b/c I missed some things...
template | result | link |
---|---|---|
ClinicalAssayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
EpigeneticsAssayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
FlowCytometryTemplate | :smile: | template link |
GenomicsAssayTemplate | :x: | |
GenomicsAssayTemplateExtended | :smile: | template link |
HumanCohortTemplate | :smile: | template link |
ImagingAssayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
LightScatteringAssayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
MethylationArrayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
MRIAssayTemplate | :x: | |
PharmacokineticsAssayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
PlateBasedReporterAssayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
ProcessedAlignedReadsTemplate | :smile: | template link |
ProcessedExpressionTemplate | :smile: | template link |
ProcessedVariantCallsTemplate | :smile: | template link |
ProteomicsAssayTemplate | :smile: | template link |
ProtocolTemplate | :smile: | template link |
RNASeqTemplate | :smile: | template link |
ScRNASeqTemplate | :x: | |
UpdateMilestoneReport | :smile: | template link |
WESTemplate | :smile: | template link |
WGSTemplate | :smile: | template link |
manifest | result | expectation |
---|---|---|
GenomicsAssayTemplate_0.csv | :x: | Lists can be blank if attr not required using ‘list like’ rule |
GenomicsAssayTemplate_1.csv | :x: | Mixing blanks and regular list values works |
GenomicsAssayTemplate_2.csv | :x: | Conditional validation for attributes is currently not supported |
GenomicsAssayTemplate_control.csv | :smile: | There should be no issue with this template. |
ScRNASeqTemplate_0.csv | :x: | Single list val works by using ‘list like’ rule |
ScRNASeqTemplate_1.csv | :smile: | Fail because of missing data in required field libraryStrand |
manifest | pass |
---|---|
GenomicsAssayTemplate_control.csv | :smile: |
OK, this is actually ready for review now 😓
Summary of additional discussion: resolution for now is to keep as single value to retain dropdown with a special selection string value like "Disease1,Disease2,Disease3" until we have better UI.
Actually, I was thinking about just pushing the annotations "Disease1,Disease2,Disease3" manually, ie w/o validation. But I could also add it as a value to the schema. I believe these contributors will not be adding more data to their project, which makes me lean towards the skip-validation approach (it's 3 files total). What do you think?
Actually, now that I think about it, if I'm skipping validation, should I just annotate it as a stringList anyway?
@allaway Yeah, let's just annotate it as stringList for these 3 files then. We can skip adding the unwieldy "Disease1,Disease2,Disease3" since there's already human validation, technically.
Superseded by #457
For NFOSI-810