Closed DavidBerdik closed 5 years ago
I don't think it is a good idea to to add binary .tar.xz
files to a git repository.
Why not add the content of the archive instead?
@DavidBerdik Did you read the license of craptev1?
No redistribution. No modifications.
That's why they're not in this repo
@doegox Ah, okay. My bad. I did not read the license of it because I was not able to find it, but I assumed that redistribution was allowed.
it's written in the header of the source code
Maybe so, but I never looked at it. It is unfortunate that the original developers chose to make it so restrictive and then stopped sharing it themselves, but I understand the implications of the license.
indeed, weird and unfortunate
At the very least, could the README be updated with the working download links I have? A hash of the files should also probably be listed for safety.
ok please submit a PR
Done! - #14
The download links for the
craptev1-v1.1.tar.xz
andcrapto1-v3.3.tar.xz
packages in the README are broken, but I was able to find them elsewhere online. To simplify usage a bit, they should be added to the repository.