Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, the DPBO links don't lead anywhere. Since we are at the moment setting up actual purls, the IRI generation needs to be adjusted a bit to account for that.
Describe the solution you'd like
The generation of the DPBO links needs to be changed like this:
current IRIs: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/DPBO_0002006
new IRIs: http://purl.org/nfdi4plants/ontology/dpbo/DPBO_0002006
Describe alternatives you've considered
I see no alternatives.
Additional context
This issue is, to some degree, related to the issue #351 which faces similar problems due to wrong IRI generation.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently, the DPBO links don't lead anywhere. Since we are at the moment setting up actual purls, the IRI generation needs to be adjusted a bit to account for that.
Describe the solution you'd like The generation of the DPBO links needs to be changed like this:
current IRIs:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/DPBO_0002006
new IRIs:http://purl.org/nfdi4plants/ontology/dpbo/DPBO_0002006
Describe alternatives you've considered I see no alternatives.
Additional context This issue is, to some degree, related to the issue #351 which faces similar problems due to wrong IRI generation.