This is a summary of discussions regarding this topic so far, and should serve as a tracking issue for further information:
We eventually want to transition to the ARC RO-Crate Profile being a first-class citizen in the ARCtrl stack. Currently, it is only an export-target without a dedicated data model.
Our aim is to add a second data model that represents the ARC as it's RO-Crate profile alongside the current ARCtrl data model. The current data model has three separate fields, representing the ISA, CWL, and FileSystem parts of the ARC, while the RO-Crate profile will unify these concepts, and therefore be a prime target for e.g. optimized query models.
This is a summary of discussions regarding this topic so far, and should serve as a tracking issue for further information:
We eventually want to transition to the ARC RO-Crate Profile being a first-class citizen in the ARCtrl stack. Currently, it is only an export-target without a dedicated data model.
Our aim is to add a second data model that represents the ARC as it's RO-Crate profile alongside the current ARCtrl data model. The current data model has three separate fields, representing the
ISA
,CWL
, andFileSystem
parts of the ARC, while the RO-Crate profile will unify these concepts, and therefore be a prime target for e.g. optimized query models.