Publication is mapped to ScholarlyArticle which has a comment field, but the current export uses the encoder to disambiguatingDescription, as does the corresponding context file.
Process is mapped to LabProcess which doesn't have a comment field, but the current export uses the encoder to Comment, contradicting its context file.
In the RO-Crate export, comments attached to ISA types should either be mapped to
comment
of typeComment
, if the ISA type maps to aschema.org
type inheriting fromCreativeWork
, ordisambiguatingDescription
of typeText
, if the ISA type maps to aschema.org
type not inheriting fromCreativeWork
.Two types contradict this convention:
Publication
andProcess
.Publication
is mapped toScholarlyArticle
which has acomment
field, but the current export uses the encoder todisambiguatingDescription
, as does the corresponding context file.Process
is mapped toLabProcess
which doesn't have acomment
field, but the current export uses the encoder toComment
, contradicting its context file.