Closed leckylao closed 9 years ago
Thank you! But can you please use respond_to?(:method)
instead of checking the class? Because people who don't use puma will get an exception. You can see this if you look at the Travis build.
Also, please create a test such that the puma path is hit (by making a fake socket or something). I hope to maintain our current level of code coverage.
Nick
Thank you @ngauthier for pointing it out.
shouldn't addrinfo be set through @socket.peeraddr?(http://www.rubydoc.info/github/puma/puma/Puma/MiniSSL/Socket#peeraddr-instance_method)
since readpartial seems not to return the addrinfo (http://www.rubydoc.info/github/puma/puma/Puma/MiniSSL/Socket:readpartial)
I ran into the same issue today
Good spot @alexandermayr
I hope this PR is merged soon, this is the only thing preventing me from using tubesock atm.
Sorry I hadn't checked on it in a while!
Version 0.2.5 released. Thanks @leckylao!
Thanks @ngauthier @leckylao
handle Puma::MiniSSL::Socket no method issue