Closed Jcahilltorre closed 2 months ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | ce6127ae90529882f7d0bf70075d920dd946152e |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/nginx-unit/deploys/65ddee87a064b3000811830b |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-102--nginx-unit.netlify.app/howto/falcon |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
Release 1.32.0 branch
Adds all the documentation changes related to Unit Release 1.32.0
...
- 1.32.0 Release news doc
- wasm-wasi-component news doc
- wasm-wasi-component doc changes
Is there some missing commits? or is that the more to come?
.
There is more to come. We are currently working on the commits.
A couple of issues I see here
1) Line lengths
I think we should stick to keeping our lines < 80 characters wide where possible, obviously commands, URL's etc should not be wrapped.
2) White space damage
These patches introduce a fair amount of excess whitespace
$ git diff --check master.. | grep -v ^+ # because the highlighted whitespace won't show here
source/configuration.rst:5137: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5140: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5141: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5149: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5150: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5152: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5153: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5154: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5163: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5167: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5168: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5169: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5171: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5172: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5177: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5183: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5189: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5197: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5282: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5287: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5288: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5290: trailing whitespace.
source/configuration.rst:5291: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:155: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:158: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:178: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:180: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:184: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:187: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:190: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:192: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:194: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:196: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:198: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:200: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:201: trailing whitespace.
source/howto/source.rst:744: trailing whitespace.
source/news/2024/index.rst:9: trailing whitespace.
source/news/2024/unit-1.32.0-released.rst:15: trailing whitespace.
source/news/2024/unit-1.32.0-released.rst:27: trailing whitespace.
source/news/2024/unit-1.32.0-released.rst:29: trailing whitespace.
source/news/2024/unit-1.32.0-released.rst:47: trailing whitespace.
source/news/2024/unit-1.32.0-released.rst:55: trailing whitespace.
White space issue can be fixed via
$ git rebase --whitespace=fix master
A couple of issues I see here
- Line lengths
I think we should stick to keeping our lines < 80 characters wide where possible, obviously commands, URL's etc should not be wrapped.
- White space damage
These patches introduce a fair amount of excess whitespace
$ git diff --check master.. | grep -v ^+ # because the highlighted whitespace won't show here
Trailing spaces slipped in when moving content from Confluence I will resolved those.
Line length is not an issue in my book. We don't enforce in any doc repos. We disable the checks in linter. We can discuss it and make a decision.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:05:57 -0800 Travis Martin @.***> wrote:
@@ -726,6 +743,17 @@ and place module-specific instructions in the Makefile.
.. tab:: WebAssembly
- .. _modules-webassembly:
- When you run :program:
./configure wasm-wasi-component
,- the script configures a module to support running WebAssembly applications on
I wonder we should s/applications/components/ to disambiguate from modules?.
You should drop cherrypick PR106 as I already merged it...
Feedback on current announcement draft. Adding checkboxes in case someone (@Jcahilltorre @tippexs ?) wants to track addressing thing in the draft.
At a very high level:
[ ] We need to write for an audience that doesn't know anything about Unit and and doesn't care about its history. For example, we should:
[ ] Sequence the sections by order of importance. Wasm first. GitHub toward the end.
[x] The Changes in Behavior section should talk more about the Docker change; itβs pretty significant. All logs are going to stderr instead of stdout now. If we think itβs useful to separately route access logs to stdout, we should either make that the default, or we should provide an example for how it can be done.
Other things:
@callahad wrote:
We need to write for an audience that doesn't know anything about Unit and and doesn't care about its history.
I disagree. I consider release notes are read by those interested in what's new and what's changed. By definition, these are existing Unit users.
@lcrilly I responded to that over in https://github.com/nginx/unit-docs/pull/110#discussion_r1503165393 if you'd like to consider my rationale here
Release 1.32.0 branch
Adds all the documentation changes related to Unit Release 1.32.0
Planned changes:
This PR is a work in progress. The planned changes above will be updated as we go.