Open nuriddin2468 opened 6 months ago
Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.
@NetanelBasal up pls.
I don't see any reason to work with HTTP. I'm willing to merge a PR that accepts a custom function to generate the id, but we don't need this code in our bundle :)
During the development phase, we encountered challenges when testing certain features due to the necessity of using private endpoints. Unfortunately, this incompatibility led to disruptions in most of the library's dialog functionalities related to cryptographic specifications. But , we have already transitioned to our self-made workaround. I can close merge request if there is no need to this fix.
Removing crypto package for generating uuid
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Generating uuid now works without "crypto" package.
What is the current behavior?
While domain is working under HTTP , crypto does not exist, so it throws an error randomUUID function not found.
Source: click
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Now it generated uuid without crypto, so in HTTP domain it works fine
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?