Open jmeinlschmidt opened 1 year ago
Start a new pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.
Hi. I looked at your example and it works fine.
of()
(in the TodoService) is synchronous, and since its effect is declared first it also prints first. that's not a problem with effects, it's how rxjs works.
Here's an example in clear rxjs https://stackblitz.com/edit/rxjs-bmjf66?devtoolsheight=60&file=index.ts
there's a doc in the elf/store
. It's a little different but still about the same how rxjs works
https://ngneat.github.io/elf/docs/troubleshooting/stale-emission
You can add auditTime(0)
to fix the problem.
Which @ngneat/effects-* package(s) are the source of the bug?
effects, effects-ng
Is this a regression?
No
Description
Please see the complete example at Stackblitz.
Although the effects execution order should be intuitively dependent on the execution order of actions, in reality, it depends on the effects declaration order.
The example provided in the Stackblitz prints
SECOND
followed byFIRST
, even though it should be the other way. In order to fix this behaviour, it is necessary to change the effects declaration order (moving theload
effect at the end). This can introduce some serious bugs which are hard to explore.Please provide a link to a minimal reproduction of the bug
https://stackblitz.com/edit/stackblitz-starters-heh5qh?devToolsHeight=33&file=src%2Ftodo.effects.ts
Please provide the exception or error you saw
No response
Please provide the environment you discovered this bug in
No response
Anything else?
In my opinion, this should be mentioned in the docs, at least.
Do you want to create a pull request?
No