Closed JohelEGP closed 6 years ago
I missed this branch because I copy pasted the one above and missed adding - to PiRatio::num. Having only changed * for /, the wrong test results led me to believe that it was a problem with the expression being more inaccurate than before.
-
PiRatio::num
*
/
Conflicts from the int support branch. I'll pull this once those are worked out.
This PR is subsumed by the accepted PR #126.
I missed this branch because I copy pasted the one above and missed adding
-
toPiRatio::num
. Having only changed*
for/
, the wrong test results led me to believe that it was a problem with the expression being more inaccurate than before.