Closed JohelEGP closed 6 years ago
Adding the changes to unit
and abbreviation
done in #150 should fix the remaining errors. I'll do it some time later.
Tell me if I should split 1435f5d into its own PR. Otherwise, this one is ready.
it's fine this way. Did you already try creating a deduction guide for <double>
units so users don't have to use templates if they don't want to? If not, I'll work on it some today.
I did try, and failed to conciliate CTAD and defaulting the underlying type to = double
.
I'll take another look when we pull strong units. We don't necessarily need a default underlying type anymore, but it would be really nice to deduce the underlying type during construction. It seems like it should be possible to me.
Resolves #138 Resolves #175 and part of #169.