Open ahatherly opened 7 years ago
I understood that the FHIR Policy approach applied to new profiles and NOT legacy implemented profiles such as in use in the Spine FGM messaging service which is live. This interface also supports the old format URI. Changing profiles to support new NHS FHIR Policy would require re-work either for spine and/ or client systems.
Perhaps the FGM resources shouldn't be published on the FHIR reference server until a later release that aligns with the policy then?
I can see a collision between Policy FHIR-PUB-02 and FHIR-PUB-03.
The IDs for some of these resources seems to have both a major and minor version in - e.g. spine-ris-patient-1-0 . I believe the agreed approach was to use just the major version in the ID, and minor/patch versions would be specified in the version element within the profile. So, the above example would become spine-ris-patient-1