Closed wbryant closed 2 years ago
Hi William, some great structural suggestions here I'll get to swiftly, including the 6/10 which is something I'll keep an eye on as we edit and consolidate into the future!
The regulation question is really interesting and something we're talking to the Multi Agency Advisory Service to work through. Some of those definitions are things we can define or refer to in the policy, but MAAS is keen to catch folks who are coming from this policy so we're figuring out what that looks like. Open source is of particular relevance to Software As Medical Device regulation, because the regulation kicks in every time a tool is implemented, which means it's of concern every time the code is copied to a new context. There's scope here to use open source to help make the regulatory process easier and more efficient both with compliance that's easier to reproduce and applications that are easier to track.
The latest MHRA consultation includes sections on open source. I believe it's in an analysis stage at the moment but as that updates so will we.
The question of 'real data' is also something under pretty hefty discussion. I can see that your role is super relevant there, can we maybe set up a chat to talk about that and your 'Open data' issue further?
Thanks I'd love to chat - I'll send through an email to set up a time.
Most of this is now folded in, or can be with static site generation. Those structural notes are still great but I need to figure out how they work with an HTML version.
Thanks this is a great template to start framing projects with an open source mindset. A few points on the steps to open sourcing. First I count 10 sections, but not sure if these sections correspond to the 6 steps of not. I would recommend a numbered list in the intro to the section to give readers some bearings when reading.
Also it would be great to get a more consistent structure in each subsection, e.g.:
A few specific comments: