Closed paulolamas18 closed 6 months ago
Two RFmx functions that were added recently don't comply with the grpc instrument name. This causes issues with automated tooling like in this PR https://dev.azure.com/ni/DevCentral/_git/ni-central/pullrequest/620589
The rest of the RFmx API follows this grpc name convention.
Visually inspected the generated proto file for the expected session name adjustment.
What does this Pull Request accomplish?
Two RFmx functions that were added recently don't comply with the grpc instrument name. This causes issues with automated tooling like in this PR https://dev.azure.com/ni/DevCentral/_git/ni-central/pullrequest/620589
Why should this Pull Request be merged?
The rest of the RFmx API follows this grpc name convention.
What testing has been done?
Visually inspected the generated proto file for the expected session name adjustment.