Closed bjce closed 7 months ago
Hi @bjce,
In MAX and SignalExpress, you are acquiring data with a +/-10 V range, but the Python add_ai_voltage_channel
method sets min_val=-5.0
and max_val=5.0
by default:
def add_ai_voltage_chan(
self, physical_channel, name_to_assign_to_channel="",
terminal_config=TerminalConfiguration.DEFAULT, min_val=-5.0,
max_val=5.0, units=VoltageUnits.VOLTS, custom_scale_name=""):
This is clipping your data to approximately a +/-5 V range. The reason it reads 5.3 V rather than 5 V is that X Series devices have a small amount of overrange so that software calibration doesn't reduce the usable range.
Try specifying min_val=-10.0
and max_val=10.0
.
Many many thanks @bkeryan for your time and your help. It worked perfefctly
Best regards
Introduction
I encountered issues with extracting data using NI-DAQmx Python algorithms (using Python 3.11 on Anaconda, with Spyder as the IDE). The data remains unchanged when I alter the settings, yielding a constant, incorrect value. This question outlines my troubleshooting process and the steps taken to resolve the issue.
Checking the Device Connected to the National Instruments (NI-DAQmx)
MAX
Initially, I utilized MAX (Measurement and Automation Explorer) to verify the device's functionality. The device appeared to operate correctly, and test panel readings matched expected theoretical values :
NI SignalExpress 2015
Further testing with NI SignalExpress 2015 confirmed that the software could accurately retrieve the expected values, indicating no issues at this stage.
Code Implementation in NI-DAQmx Python
Despite anticipating seamless integration with the NI-DAQmx Python API, problems emerged: The values returned by basic algorithms were static and inconsistent with both expected fluctuations and previous measurements, displaying values such as 5.3, which were incongruent with prior results. Below, I detailed the algorithms attempted and their respective outcomes.
First Algorithms and Results
Second Algorithms and Results
Bug Resolution attempt
I verified the device name and ports, ensuring accuracy in their specification. Additionally, I regularly cleared the device of any residual data to prevent issues related to data overflow or corruption.
Conclusion
I am at a loss regarding the cause of these discrepancies between NI SignalExpress 2015 and NI-DAQmx or how to rectify them. Any assistance or guidance would be greatly appreciated.