Closed mure closed 2 years ago
I created the class DataFrameClient
which strays from the convention of the tag client that has a TagManager
class instead. Does anyone have strong opinions that we should keep the "manager" convention? It would be something like DataTableManager
instead.
I created the class
DataFrameClient
which strays from the convention of the tag client that has aTagManager
class instead. Does anyone have strong opinions that we should keep the "manager" convention? It would be something likeDataTableManager
instead.
I agree with moving away from using "manager" in the client name. It really has no significance to the client itself.
Are we still planning to rename the package to nisystemlink?
Yes, that'll be in another PR.
What does this Pull Request accomplish?
Creates a subpackage "dataframe" that provides a new client for the DataFrame service.
Why should this Pull Request be merged?
We need a place to organize the dataframe modules.
What testing has been done?
n/a