Log intermediate steps for building nipkgs, including the control file name.
Why should this Pull Request be merged?
@Karl-G1 and I were confused by the lack of logs in this area - it wasn't clear if a package was not being built, or if was just not being archived correctly.
Adding the control file name to the output should make it easier to grep for things.
What testing has been done?
[x] Building a PR which should have multiple packages built and verifying the output.
What does this Pull Request accomplish?
Log intermediate steps for building nipkgs, including the control file name.
Why should this Pull Request be merged?
@Karl-G1 and I were confused by the lack of logs in this area - it wasn't clear if a package was not being built, or if was just not being archived correctly.
Adding the control file name to the output should make it easier to grep for things.
What testing has been done?