Open killakalle opened 3 years ago
We receive all routes as the above example examines. We can hide the route from the list when the route descriptor (3rd argument) is null. @scd @rouletout what do you think? Hide the routes without path or stay visible?
The received data for this page: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/30682796/116606743-736dcf00-a931-11eb-973b-832bd11106ac.png
` [ 3374530191, 1601330667, [ [ "Route", 3079161984, null, 2561079750, 5 ], [ "Route", 3079163736, null, 2561079750, 6 ], [ "Route", 3079166367, null, 2561079750, 7 ], [ "Route", 3079168224, null, null, 9999 ], [ "Route", 3079169628, null, 2561079750, 8 ], [ "Route", 3079171029, null, 2561079750, 9 ], [ "Route", 3079172304, "187.2 360.5,189.3 314.2,190.3 245.6,188.9 212.2,191.7 143 lower", 2561079750, 10 ], [ "Route", 3079173666, "203.3 366.1,203.3 325.6,203.4 301.1,210 269.1,201.6 188.7,203 154.8,205.3 130.3 lower", 2561079750, 11 ], [ "Route", 3079175439, "222.9 372.3,222.7 329.4,228.4 283.7,230.3 238.6,225.1 172.7,222.3 136 lower", 2561079750, 12 ], [ "Route", 3079178721, "261.5 376.4,261.5 326.2,260.8 275.3,252.4 223.5,244.4 163.7,245.3 115.3 lower", 2561079750, 14 ], [ "Route", 3079211568, "292.4 372.6,287.2 270.8,274.4 198.7,266.6 117.5 lower", 2561079750, 15 ], [ "Route", 3079211655, "314.9 370,313 333.9,312.1 283.3,302.2 227.7,292.4 183,283 149.2,280.6 117.6 lower", 2561079750, 16 ], [ "Route", 3079211742, "338.9 364.8,339.3 326.1,335.2 272.4,329.1 235.7,312.1 200,299.9 151,297.1 117.6 lower", 2561079750, 17 ], [ "Route", 3079211829, "354 356.3,355 324.3,352.6 280.9,351.2 241.8,344.1 177.4,325.8 114.3 lower", 2561079750, 18 ], [ "Route", 3079211916, "375.7 351.5,370.2 321.3,370.5 287,373.3 256.4,375.2 232,387.1 200.5,392.6 164.2 label,386.9 136,375.2 107.3 lower", 2561079750, 20 ], [ "Route", 3079212003, "375.7 351.5,370.2 321.3,370.5 287,373.3 256.4,375.2 232,365.8 193.4,358.7 151,375.2 107.3 lower", 2561079750, 19 ], [ "Route", 3079212120, "416.3 349.6,413.6 296.1,409.5 249.4,412.4 202.8,410.5 146.8,424.1 111.5 lower", 2561079750, 21 ] ], 4608, 3456, "8c6934d7489163fc649870ef174e94a513582cb9", null, 2524410093 ]
`
I think they shouldn't show but I leave the technical solution to you @scd and @andrasbari
Fixed, closing
@rouletout This is not fixed. The behavior looks still the same. Please, re-open this issue.
What happened? The route list of topos does not match that of the topo image.
Compare the topos and the listed routes under each topo image of sector Ruinas en Gestalgar. For some topos those don't match.
Maybe related to https://github.com/theCrag/tca/issues/110 However, on this particular sector, Ruinas, I am not aware of any recent changes on the topos.
Example url(s) to reproduce the problem:
https://www.thecrag.com/es/escalar/spain/valencia/gestalgar/area/2561079750/topo#t3374530185
Ideally also provide screenshots:
Website - route list matches drawn topo routes
App - route list has additional routes
App - no 27 is not in topo
Some more topos on this sector have the same issue
What you expected:
FYI there are also crags where linked routes are not drawn, but the topo is still shown (in the website), e.g. https://www.thecrag.com/es/escalar/spain/valencia/area/3067857549/topo#t3474850719