search

nicehash / NiceHashMiner

NiceHash Miner
Other
482 stars 217 forks source link

1.8.1.2 - Neoscrypt on GTX970 and 1080Ti #261

Closed MonaxDK closed 6 years ago

MonaxDK commented 7 years ago

Apparently, ccminer_tpruvot is not suitable for older video cards. GTX 970, NHML 1.8.1.1 970-1811 GTX 970, NHML 1.8.1.2 970-1812

But for 1080Ti real miracles happen :) 3x1080Ti NHML 1.8.1.1 1080-1811 3x1080Ti NHML 1.8.1.2 1080-1812

luongk commented 7 years ago

That wasn't my experience with my 980GTX, for what it's worth - https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/235

rickrs commented 7 years ago

i dont know what happned

but, 1.8.1.2 my profit is $usd/day 2.49 ( half hour test) and 1.8.1.1 my profit is $usd/day 3.60 ( half hour test)

i checked again, same results.

i have one gtx 1080 ti 11 gb. windows 10, nvidia driver 385.28, 16 gb ram, i7 first generation

overclock none.

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 9:30 PM, MonaxDK notifications@github.com wrote:

Apparently, ccminer_tpruvot is not suitable for older video cards. GTX 970, NHML 1.8.1.1 [image: 970-1811] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29005588/29999608-d78caaf2-9057-11e7-8082-e83c3f93d1b4.png GTX 970, NHML 1.8.1.2 [image: 970-1812] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29005588/29999613-04e00274-9058-11e7-8870-b1c364735d62.png

But for 1080Ti real miracles happen :) 3x1080Ti NHML 1.8.1.1 [image: 1080-1811] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29005588/29999615-17100cdc-9058-11e7-8a36-8d8bbaab9f95.png 3x1080Ti NHML 1.8.1.2 [image: 1080-1812] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29005588/29999616-1fb6a79c-9058-11e7-867a-f664ea771e87.png

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/261, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABf1HXxUPn5S47_wmkJxrzMx_rCts4Ueks5sefMLgaJpZM4PLDJF .

luongk commented 7 years ago

You can't really go by USD - the price of BTC/crypto is so variable.

Has your hash rate changed?

MaKCuMyC commented 7 years ago

I got two EVGA GTX 980 Ti with 1.8.1.1 I had about ~0.88 MH/s on each. with 1.8.1.2 I have about ~0.75 MH/s on each.

please, use correct miner for NVIDIA 9xx.

DillonN commented 7 years ago

Sorry tpruvot is giving you less performance on 900 cards, I'll get this fixed in next version

As a workaround for now you could copy ccminer_neoscrypt over the tpruvot ccminer.exe, but that could hamper other algorithms

MonaxDK commented 7 years ago

Not a big problem, neoscrypt is never the most profitable algorithm on 9 series anyway. In fact, given the difference in performance on 10 series cards, it is very interesting if other algorithms can benefit from the use of tpruvot?

VParhom commented 7 years ago

Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming

i replace miner in folder NHML-1.8.1.1\bin\ccminer_neoscrypt to KlauT-ccminer v.8.13 1811

in version 1.8.1.2, I get a much smaller hash 1812

in version 1.8.1.2 the possibility of substitution of a miner in a folder was disabled

maybe it's worth making a customizable path to the right miner?

adem4ik commented 7 years ago

well Klaust's ccminer gives me better hashes too, for about 10%.

I thinks there should be multiple miners for Neoscrypt, so users can use Benchmark and NHML will choose the best solution for everyone.

VParhom commented 7 years ago

and add one more screenshot with ccminer-alexis78... alexis

ChriscomIT commented 7 years ago

@adem4ik Yeah that looks like a real good solution especially with multi GPU setups in mind.

MonaxDK commented 7 years ago

Perhaps it is worth having the option of selecting a miner for each algorithm, not just for Neoscrypt? Given that unexpectedly on another miner you can get 4x hash rate...

dinicthis commented 7 years ago

That would be great. Equihash now has a choice of a couple or maybe more? EWBF rocks, for me, 350+ sol/s on a 980.

dinicthis commented 7 years ago

And all these things are why we use NHML and not NHM. NHM gives you no choice but to put up with lower-profit mining. NHML allows you to choose the algo and device.

DillonN commented 7 years ago

In the next version, there will be .JSON files generated by NHML that you can edit to change which ccminer fork is used on each device family

Thank you for reporting faster miners though!

VParhom commented 7 years ago

I think it is better to make it possible for every miner to test all the algorithms available on the NH pool.

and then, according to the results of the benchmark, you will see which miner on which hardware is the best

sorry for my bad English :)

VParhom commented 7 years ago

Here is an example of the result of the NemosMiner-v2.1-Zpool benchmark for 2x GTX 1070 sorted by the current profitability nemos

MonaxDK commented 7 years ago

It would be fantastic if NHML had such a benchmark. It's very difficult to manually test all the algorithms on all miners ...

VParhom commented 7 years ago

I do not do benchmarking of every video card on all the rigs in NHML, I do a benchmark for one video card on one of the rigs, and then I copy the results to the remaining .json files in all the rigs.

MonaxDK commented 7 years ago

If such a benchmark is difficult to integrate into NHML, perhaps it's worth creating a separate topic, and invite users to share the results of their benchmarks in Zpool? Thus, it will be possible to collect statistics which miners work faster on certain video cards. Here are my results for 3x 1080Ti bench Not all miners / algorithms have been tested, because Zpool is buggy :)