[DataCap Application] ePublishing

[usejsi]

Version

1

DataCap Applicant

ePublishing

Project ID

ePublishing001

Data Owner Name

ePublishing

Data Owner Country/Region

United States

Data Owner Industry

Life Science / Healthcare

Website

https://www.epublishing.com/about/

Social Media Handle

https://www.epublishing.com/about/

Social Media Type

Twitter

What is your role related to the dataset

Data Preparer

Total amount of DataCap being requested

10PiB

Expected size of single dataset (one copy)

1PiB

Number of replicas to store

10

Weekly allocation of DataCap requested

512TiB

On-chain address for first allocation

f1blcdr5udxdsxls6wvltwv46eo4iyivxmhhfsniy

Data Type of Application

Public, Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)

Custom multisig

• [ ] Use Custom Multisig

Identifier

No response

Share a brief history of your project and organization

ePublishing is an integrated modern media tech stack driving revenue, improving productivity, and increasing engagement for publishers of content and data. They streamline editorial and audience workflows, amplify content delivery, diversify and grow revenue, and leverage a unified, data-first publishing ecosystem.

Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?

No

If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders

No response

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

The data being stored are the archives and historical editorial and images from media companies - from daily newspapers to monthly magazines - that may reach back as far as 100 years.

Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from

AWS Cloud

If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)

Canada

If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?

No response

If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)

No response

Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.

No response

Please share a sample of the data

https://i.imgur.com/P4eoAZw.png

Sample image used in a old new york times article, one that epublishing manages and stores.

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network

• [X] I confirm

If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason

No response

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data

Yearly

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin

2 to 3 years

In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals

Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, Europe

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers

Cloud storage (i.e. S3), IPFS, Shipping hard drives, Lotus built-in data transfer

How did you find your storage providers

Slack, Partners

If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you used

No response

Please list the provider IDs and location of the storage providers you will be working with.

f03179570 SINGAPORE
f02826253 SINGAPORE
f02826815 HK
f03151449 SHENZHEN
f03151456 SHENZHEN

How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers

Boost client, Lotus client

If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline

Yes

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Application is waiting for allocator review

[nicelove666]

Thank you for your application, please fill in https://github.com/nicelove666/IPFSTT-Client-Due-Diligence-Form/issues/new/choose.

Our main focus is:

You need to provide comprehensive SP information, including SP, geographical location, and company name. Why do you want to put the data on Filecoin? Do you have relevant data processing experience? Can you satisfy spark retrieval and store unseal files?

[usejsi]

https://github.com/nicelove666/IPFSTT-Client-Due-Diligence-Form/issues/4

[usejsi]

DataPulse f02838518 Moscow, Moscow, RU
Insightrix f02832475 Bangkok, Bangkok, TH DataNova f02859053 Hanover, New Jersey, US IntelliSphere f02826253 SINGAPORE ShuJie f02826815 HK YunXi f03151449 SHENZHEN YunXi f03151456 SHENZHEN

[usejsi]

We have enough experience in data processing, our team is already downloading data, and we have developed our own data software to prevent CID sharing. In addition, we have checked that all the SPs we work with support Spark retrieval.

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Datacap Request Trigger

Total DataCap requested

10PiB

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

512TiB

DataCap Amount - First Tranche

256TiB

Client address

f1blcdr5udxdsxls6wvltwv46eo4iyivxmhhfsniy

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

Client address

f1blcdr5udxdsxls6wvltwv46eo4iyivxmhhfsniy

DataCap allocation requested

256TiB

Id

d0584abe-f05b-407b-b44a-f7264ffcd2ea

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Application is ready to sign

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacec777u6qvhcbu4yjkivnrm4kgdz6onbhj4b47jzl6fntxts4azvvq

Address

f1blcdr5udxdsxls6wvltwv46eo4iyivxmhhfsniy

Datacap Allocated

256TiB

Signer Address

f16hmuu3w247dkkhsrbbcbeqbugmpjbxpkrpcdatq

Id

d0584abe-f05b-407b-b44a-f7264ffcd2ea

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec777u6qvhcbu4yjkivnrm4kgdz6onbhj4b47jzl6fntxts4azvvq

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Application is Granted

[nicelove666]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

No active deals found for this client.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[usejsi]

Hello, the quota has been used up, can you help us?

[nicelove666]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[nicelove666]

Can you explain why this SP does not support spark?

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Issue has been modified. Changes below:

(OLD vs NEW)

Please list the provider IDs and location of the storage providers you will be working with: f03179570 SINGAPORE f02826253 SINGAPORE f02826815 HK f03151449 SHENZHEN f03151456 SHENZHEN vs f02838518 Moscow, Moscow, RU
f02832475 Bangkok, Bangkok, TH f02859053 Hanover, New Jersey, US f02826253 SINGAPORE f02826815 HK f03151449 SHENZHEN f03151456 SHENZHEN State: ChangesRequested vs Granted

[usejsi]

@nicelove666 f03179570 is a new SP. We all know that SP needs to wait for time after registration before it can be displayed on spark. And the quota for the first round is only 256T. I hope you can sign the second round for us. We believe that the data at that time will see a significant improvement. Thank you!

[usejsi]

We modified the sp of the application form yesterday. Since this is the first round, we changed the sp information and hope to get your support. Sincerely, our DC has been used up and we look forward to your help.

[nicelove666]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

⚠️ 33.33% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 12.97%

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[nicelove666]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 3 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f03179570: 49.71%, f03151456: 49.95%, f03151449: 49.83%

⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[nicelove666]

There are too many duplicate data, and the retrieval rate of some sp is less than 20%. Although we understand that this is the first round, the amount of data is relatively small and not enough to feedback all the situations. However, we cannot sign for you again, sorry

[usejsi]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 3 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f03179570: 49.71%, f03151456: 49.95%, f03151449: 49.83%

⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[usejsi]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 3 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f03179570: 49.71%, f03151456: 49.95%, f03151449: 49.83%

⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[usejsi]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 3 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f03179570: 49.71%, f03151456: 49.95%, f03151449: 49.83%

⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[usejsi]

There are too many duplicate data, and the retrieval rate of some sp is less than 20%. Although we understand that this is the first round, the amount of data is relatively small and not enough to feedback all the situations. However, we cannot sign for you again, sorry

I'm really sorry, this may be a technical error. But we only got the first round of 256T, Can you give us another chance to sign 512T for us?

[nicelove666]

Since yours is a new account, the trust value is relatively low, and many problems have occurred, so I'm sorry that I can't sign for you.

[usejsi]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 3 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f03179570: 49.71%, f03151456: 49.95%, f03151449: 49.83%

⚠️ 80.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[usejsi]

The retrieval rate of Spark continues to improve.The issue with data backup is that the first round only has 256T, which is too little.

If you could sign us up for the next round, we would definitely be able to solve the data backup issue and continuously improve the Spark retrieval rate.If the data backup issue is not resolved in the next round and you no longer sign for us, we can understand.

Sincerely, thank you.

[nicelove666]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

⚠️ 80.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[nicelove666]

Congratulations, your data has been updated, spark is looks good, we will sign it for you later.

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Issue information change request has been approved.

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Application is in Refill

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacecbyxtwrvbgxoervr36ztr56sfzxwhh46dd5ccmm6vihi4wnpq5c4

Address

f1blcdr5udxdsxls6wvltwv46eo4iyivxmhhfsniy

Datacap Allocated

512TiB

Signer Address

f16hmuu3w247dkkhsrbbcbeqbugmpjbxpkrpcdatq

Id

bb33a035-6936-4811-aa26-dd072b9a24a6

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecbyxtwrvbgxoervr36ztr56sfzxwhh46dd5ccmm6vihi4wnpq5c4

[datacap-bot[bot]]

Application is Granted

[nicelove666]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

⚠️ 80.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[nicelove666]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary[^1]

Storage Provider Distribution

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

⚠️ 57.14% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients[^3]

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

[nicelove666]

[nicelove666]

Congratulations, the spark retrieval rate has been improved. Please continue. The cooperation SP and disclosure SP are inconsistent, please explain.

[usejsi]

In order to let you to support us quickly (the last round of signatures took about 25 days to wait), we strictly require SP to store files. We borrow FIL, so we hope to get it as soon as possible.

[usejsi]

It has been more than a month since we submitted the application. During this period, we have contacted new SPs, so we added 3 SPs, they are f02825282 (HK), f03178144 (JP), and f03214937 (US).