This is currently missing for people to be able to pass their own nanobind targets, which might be necessary if the default options do not cut it.
The precedent is cc_binary's mallocslot, which takes a label pointing to a custom malloc implementation to use, falling back to a well-established default.
This is currently missing for people to be able to pass their own nanobind targets, which might be necessary if the default options do not cut it.
The precedent is
cc_binary'smallocslot, which takes a label pointing to a custom malloc implementation to use, falling back to a well-established default.Probably urgent.