Closed karlfreeman closed 1 year ago
I've gone ahead and assumed, (potentially incorrectly) @nickelser that MIT might be the desired licence for this repo. I'm currently conducting an audit of dependencies so it would be great to get some clarification.
Closes #19 and #13
I've gone ahead and assumed, (potentially incorrectly) @nickelser that MIT might be the desired licence for this repo. I'm currently conducting an audit of dependencies so it would be great to get some clarification.
Closes #19 and #13