Awesome efforts, and this suggestion is only to help, but all the repetitive definitions of string'd values like: "static NSString *const FXFormFieldSegue = @"segue";" might be made far more useful if instead each type was shown in a brief example. Given then are constant'd anyway, we don't actually need to know the string'd value. I'd far rather see the segue example from real code rather than this definition of the constant's value... ;) cheers!
Awesome efforts, and this suggestion is only to help, but all the repetitive definitions of string'd values like: "static NSString *const FXFormFieldSegue = @"segue";" might be made far more useful if instead each type was shown in a brief example. Given then are constant'd anyway, we don't actually need to know the string'd value. I'd far rather see the segue example from real code rather than this definition of the constant's value... ;) cheers!