In the Iso2k database, the siteName (s) for the IC10VISE and IC10VISG records are swapped. According to the original reference , the iso2k names are correct, but 'VISE' should correspond to Site E and 'VISG to Site G.
Instead, in the current version 'VISE is Site G and 'VISG is Site E.
'VISE
'VISG
In addition, in the Iso2k database these records span 1778-1970, while in the inserted table above from the original reference (10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.11.002) these seem to cover a different time period.
Dear Authors,
In the Iso2k database, the siteName (s) for the IC10VISE and IC10VISG records are swapped. According to the original reference , the iso2k names are correct, but 'VISE' should correspond to Site E and 'VISG to Site G.
Instead, in the current version 'VISE is Site G and 'VISG is Site E.
'VISE
'VISG
In addition, in the Iso2k database these records span 1778-1970, while in the inserted table above from the original reference (10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.11.002) these seem to cover a different time period.