This looks like normalised data? It seems to be following the Kaufmann et al 2009 reference through to Anderson et al 2006...
Would it be useful to lable it as such in the units (as IC16WENG), or mark it FALSE as an Iso2k time series as there is another Dye-3 record (IC06VID3)?
This looks like normalised data? It seems to be following the Kaufmann et al 2009 reference through to Anderson et al 2006...
Would it be useful to lable it as such in the units (as IC16WENG), or mark it FALSE as an Iso2k time series as there is another Dye-3 record (IC06VID3)?