Closed alexveecle closed 1 month ago
So why did you decide to show dirs
over directories
? It feels to me like the directories
API is a bit more modular and higher-level which probably makes more sense for our intended audience.
From https://github.com/nicoburns/blessed-rs/discussions/139#discussioncomment-10913757
probably for
dirs
withdirectories
mentioned in the notes (HTML links work in notes sections)
But I really don't have a strong opinion. Personally, being able to construct a nice path for my application with directories
looks nice.
probably for
dirs
withdirectories
mentioned in the notes (HTML links work in notes sections)But I really don't have a strong opinion. Personally, being able to construct a nice path for my application with
directories
looks nice.
I also don't really have a strong opinion on this. I'd be tempted to list both as "recommendations" (noting that dirs
is slightly lower-level and directories
slightly higher level) and stick etcetera
under "see also".
Tbh, it looks like dirs
and directories
crates really ought to be one crate. They're both tiny wrappers around dirs-sys
.
I also don't really have a strong opinion on this. I'd be tempted to list both as "recommendations" (noting that
dirs
is slightly lower-level anddirectories
slightly higher level) and sticketcetera
under "see also".
This sounds good to me.
Tbh, it looks like
dirs
anddirectories
crates really ought to be one crate. They're both tiny wrappers arounddirs-sys
.
Agreed.
Sorry, it's been a busy period. I tried to capture the latest suggestions here. Feel free to just overwrite with any wording you prefer- I'm also happy to apply any suggestions.
Thanks!
From https://github.com/nicoburns/blessed-rs/discussions/139.