Closed nicschumann closed 11 months ago
Thinking more about length scale – it doesn't really make sense to show a map indicator outside of the space being visualized. Since we're using a perspective camera, the number of pixels a feature takes up isn't proportional to how big it is, but to how close it is.
I wonder if instead, we mention the number of meters per simulation cell: 12.25 square meters per cell at rendering resolution. This gives a sense of scale, abstractly.
Maybe deprioritize this for now ... return to this after the other stuff is done, if there's time.
This is closed with #47.
Add some metadata to the UI to reinforce that changes are happening over time.
Metadata