nicwortel / indexfondsenvergelijken.nl

A comparison website for index funds, ETF's, banks and brokers in the Netherlands
https://www.indexfondsenvergelijken.nl/
51 stars 17 forks source link

Costs for ABN are out of date #39

Closed miguelci closed 6 months ago

miguelci commented 7 months ago

For already some time, the costs are different:

image

https://www.abnamro.nl/en/personal/investments/types-of-investing/self-directed-investing-basic/index.html

see: More information and conditions -> costs

ArdaXi commented 6 months ago

ABN Amro lists their service costs as annual, but charges them each quarter. So the calculation also takes them into account quarterly. The information is correct.

miguelci commented 6 months ago

but aren't these the numbers being used in the application? they seem wrong from what i posted above no?

{
        "name": "ABN Amro",
        "logo": "abn.png",
        "product": "Zelf Beleggen Basis",
        "serviceFee": {
            "tiers": [
                {"upperLimit": 100000, "percentage": 0.05},
                {"upperLimit": 400000, "percentage": 0.03},
                {"upperLimit": null, "percentage": 0.015}
            ]
        },
ArdaXi commented 6 months ago

You missed the very next line.

"serviceFeeCalculation": "endOfQuarter",

EDIT: Slightly less glib, looking at the code it assumes everywhere that costs are quarterly, unless monthly is specified. This is after all how most brokers operate. So really, the cost overview from the bank is misleading. The same way they tend to be with interest rates.

If you were to take it into account the way they advertise, you would ignore the compounding effect of the multiple charges in a year.

miguelci commented 6 months ago

oh okok, got it. was focusing on the actual percentage number and didn't reach that part. thanks!

nicwortel commented 6 months ago

No worries @miguelci, it's actually a common mistake and I have to figure out a way to make this more clear on the website to prevent the confusion. Either way, thank you for contributing to the accuracy of the website!

And @ArdaXi thank you for helping to sort it out, I have been busy with other things lately and must have missed this issue :sweat_smile: