Project Week 2 | APCSA

[utterances-bot]

Project Week 2 | APCSA

Scrum Board, Issues, Tangibles

https://nighthawkcoders.github.io/APCSA/points/9

[dtsivkovski]

Team 1 Video Submission

• Daniel, Everitt, Natalie, Sophie,

Graded, see review ticket

[evmyclipz]

Period 1Team 8 Video Submission:

• Dylan Luo, Ritvik Keerthi, Aryan Shah, Rohan Malipeddi

Lots of good diagrams and explanation in pieces. After watching except for a short page shared by Aryan, I was confused on FE and BE tie together. Local storage probably had something to do with it. You have a lot of technical features, but I am a little confused on total workflow. Other sections on deployment, process, diagrams are real strong. Just seems like it needs one more pass to bring everything together 4.5/5

[rjawesome]

Period 2 Rohan J, Kinish S, Jay M, Gabe B

The flow and transition of video was very professionally done. The entirety showed a lot of coordination. The technique of showing highlights was very nice. The lacking portion was not having enough frontend work to really highlight purpose of project and a little more backend to support that connection. All the process parts were nicely done. 4.6/5

[samayass]

Period 1 Samaya Sankuratri, Alice Tang, Sarayu Pochimireddy, Iris Yang

Nice use of blog. Wires and visuals are very strong. Database vs List, perhaps List extracted from database is the way it should be considered. Plans look great. 4.6/5

[icyGS]

Period 1 Krish Patil, Nathan Manangan, Nicholas Ramos, Don Tran

Good combination of in progress work and design work. Nice to see early command on backend. I don't like voice speed up and it is considered to be unprofessional and distracting. In fact, instructions were less words. Good participation by all. I have confidence in your success technically. 4.5/5

[aaditgupta21]

Period 1 Aadit Gupta, Adi Khandelwal, Somaditya Singh, and Tianbin Liu

Graded, see review ticket.

[xiaoa0]

Period 1 Allie Xiao, Soren Zhuang, Avinh Huynh, Michael Sanborn

Graded on review ticket

[7unlim]

Period 1 Jun Lim, Yash Shah, Rithwikh Varma, Aidan Wu

Graded on review ticket

[aaravarora01]

Period 1 Aarav Arora, Braeden Copley, Tigran Arakelov, Vunsh Mehta

Graded on review ticket

[hetvit27]

Period 2 Hetvi Trivedi, Jazair Tallman, Ellen Xu, Brian Tang

The intro was really engaging. There is good work in many areas: deployment, planning, apis. My big concern is that there is supposed to be an APP for Frontend (show by Hetvi, Fastpages) and and APP for Backend (Flask suggested). However, Ellen and Brian are showing FE work in Flask. I do believe it will be simpler for quality of presentation if you stick with Fastpages. 4.5/5

[rebecca-123]

Period 2

Video

Presenting in following order: Scrum Master: Rebecca Su Dev Ops: Linda Liu Frontend Developer: Divyanshi Suri Backend Developer: Vaishavi Jayashankar

This is amazing, the plans and thoughts that went into this are not lost on me. Every portion make me very confident that this is a great plan. Visuals on frontend are great, diagram on backend are well understood, with supplements of tables that make it seem very real. I like the quick tour through deployment and it made tasks seem very simple and doable. Above anything I expected to see today. 5/5

[CalissaT]

Period 2 Team 10: Calissa, Evan, Samuel, Kian Team Review Ticket

Graded in review ticket

[ftc13184-SK]

Period 2, Team 5 Video Names: Shraddha Kadaba, Pranavi Inukurti, Meena Annamalai, Madhumita Narayan

There were some good visuals on Scrum, Deployment that made talking a share information behind the scenes very logical. FE discussion had good language, but nothing that I could grab onto, I would of expected wires. Backend shared some good progress and technicals, perhaps missing UML though listing was close. It seem like there are a couple of layers of data that need to be considered. There is a lot of good progress. 4.5/5

[VidhiKulkarni]

Period 2, Team 2

Names: Vidhi Kulkarni, Riya Patil, Lily Wu, William Wu

I am very impressed how this flows from front to back. Plus, you shared great depth in all the key areas. Visuals, data, backend, process, deployment were all covered thoroughly and showing a great deal of command. Next step of development, from my perspective is how your user flow proceeds in frontend. But you are building a lot of confidence in ability to acheive project. 4.8/5

[ftc13184-SK]

Period 2

Video

Presenting in following order: Scrum Master: Rebecca Su Dev Ops: Linda Liu Frontend Developer: Divyanshi Suri Backend Developer: Vaishavi Jayashankar

Great use of wireframe to show an overview of the project. You presented a concise presentation of your project.

[kar722]

Evan Yang, Karthik Valluri, Pranav Sarathy, Sanjay Bharadwaj

Period 2 Team 3 Video

Period 2 Team 3 Issue

Scored on review ticket.

[rohitd3]

Scrum Master: Nathan Frontend Developer: Sahil Backend Developer: Rohit Dev Ops: Kurtis

Period 2 Breadbops Video

The wire frames seem nice, but I am confused as you are doing FE work in Flask. Are you on track for two different APPS, suggested was FE in FastPages for easy formatting, BE in Flask. Thought, toward the end you are showing Fastpages as FE. This is confusing. Planning and tangibles look nice. Planning concepts of Wire Frames and UML are nice to see. Good discussion on backend. BTW, deployment updates should not require restart of Nginx service. 4.5/5

[AkhilNandhakumar]

Period 2 Video for Akhil, Tristan, Reem, Saathvika

Organization seems strong. You have a lot of well thought out ideas. Codehoots screens look interesting, but that could be an area for more ideation. I am concerned about Firebase mention as this is a Java class, so I am hoping backend will stick to POJO/JPA style. I might trim an idea or two, like login, just to try and experiment with the Codehoots feature as primary. The presentation is nice and flows well, a little disconnect on requirements 4.7/5

[shreya-ahujaa]

Period 1 Team BASE Video

Team Members: Shreya Ahuja (Scrum Master), Aadya Daita (DevOps), Ellie Rozenkrants (Frontend Developer), Bria Gilliam (Backend Developer)

Excellent usage of Blogging throughout, really happy to see you stick to this medium as it is persistent and easy to update. This is a key part of a project is to have a strategy to keep and look over ideas. Planning, Deployment, Frontend, and Backend discussions were easily identified. Only issue, not enough of an idea for me to understand some of the key features of site. More details were discussing things like login, but I think you should focus on some key features. 4.8/5

[supermengman]

Period 2 Team 8

video

people: Andrew Meng, Rohan Gaikwad, Bailey Say, Nicholas Mounier

One of the requirements is to have a clear FE and BE discussed. These are supposed to be distinct apps and it looks like that requirements is missing. It seems FE theme is going to Flask/Thymeleaf, I was advising against that and have not shown that as path in class. All the planning, deployment and backend discussions were nice. 4.5/5

[ghost]

Period 1 Team 5 Video Serafina, Saumya, Prisha,Armaan

The introduction was great overview of the many processes and had complements with easy to read information. The discussion led to clear FE and then deployment. This dialog shared planning and management. My only concern might be Login and Chat room support given the short time frame. But, I wanted APIs and DB in the project. You could trade features, but would be on your own on Login and Chat implementation. Nice planning in general and looks like you are well coordinated 4.6/5