search

nighthawkcoders / teacher_portfolio

GitHub Pages / Jupyter Notebook guides for Python, Java, JavaScript, Linux
https://nighthawkcoders.github.io/teacher_portfolio/
Apache License 2.0
1 stars 51 forks source link

CSP Team Teach Grading #94

Open jm1021 opened 9 months ago

jm1021 commented 9 months ago

Have a Team Meeting. Review instruction in canvas. Leave comment below with information as follows.

P1: SASS Team

Student Grades <link to hacks/scores>

iKAN2025 commented 9 months ago

P2 The Undecidable Problems Team Grades

0.98 Isabel Marilla. She did the lesson intro, provided outlines for everyone on their team to teach, and started the homework Google form. 0.95 Justin. He did the grading, on spreadsheets lesson intro 0.93 Vibha. Did lesson popcorn hacks, and helped with homework Google form. 0.98 Anusha. Helped organize homework, grading, and explain core concept of undecided problems

Student Grades: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hlVr5oF16rMlbf2fr_R6t_CIx7VOq0qtrBr_-4YbjE4/edit#gid=1098710195 Link to Team Teach: https://jplip.github.io/frontTri2//2023/12/13/UndecidedProblems_IPYNB_2_.html

Th35py27 commented 9 months ago

P2 The Internet Team Grades

0.97 Varun: Worked on 2 portions of the team teach (domains and bandwith), gathered notes for the other portions for the team teach.

0.98 Nandan: Made the kahoot, did some of the grading, wrote the commentary and information on the ipynb file for the team teach and made popcorn hacks.

0.95 Torin: Worked on the beginning of the team teach, covering what the internet is and worked on popcorn hacks.

0.96 Arnav: Worked on UDP and TCP parts of the team teach, and did contributed towards the grading.

Link to team teach: https://nighthawkcoders.github.io/teacher_portfolio//2023/11/27/P2_Internet_IPYNB_2_.html Link to student grades: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tqZv4oiH59HNgXeq0nPLhjHi3WfapQVZnKpAP0W22bk/edit?usp=sharing

tuckergol commented 9 months ago

Team Teach Link Raw Team Teach Link

Scores

P2: Legal and Ethical Concerns Team Teach Team

Self Evaluation

Tucker G: 0.94 Tanuj N: 0.86 Alara I: 0.93 Monika R: 0.9

Explanation

alishahussain commented 9 months ago

Period 2

Team Teach

Alisha Hussain

Sergi Serpukhovitinov

Vance Reynolds

Abdullah Khanani:

Anika Bhatnagar

Ankit-177 commented 9 months ago

Period 4: Crowdsourcing team teach

Self-evaluation:

Contributions:

Link to student grades: Period 4 Crowdsourcing grades

Arushi-maker commented 9 months ago

P4: Digital Divide Team Teach

Self Evaluation

Arushi P: 0.96 Ananya A: 0.96 Priya S: 0.95 Sumedha K: 0.94

Explanation

Ananya was in charge of the input of information, Arushi rewrote/summarized information and added different fonts. Priya helped edit and present the lesson. Sumedha helped with the details of the team teach information and make sure we understood everything we presented.

Link to Grades Link to Notebook

JasonGao76 commented 9 months ago

Period 5 Lopez, Beneficial and Harmful Effects

Self Evaluation Nathan O: 0.93/1

Rayyan D: 0.98/1

Grayson G: 0.93/1

Will B: 0.95/1

Jason G: 0.98/1

YeongsuKimm commented 9 months ago

Self Evaluation: Yeongsu Kim 0.94 Advik Garg 0.96 William Cheng 0.94 Aashray Reddy 0.94 Yeongsu Kim - Made and taught section: Beware, Establish practices for your Safety. Participated in grading Aashray Reddy - Made and taught section: Personal Identifiable Information. Participated in grading. William Cheng- Made and taught section: Nefarious Uses of Internet. Participated in grading. Advik Garg - Made and taught section: Factors to Increase Security of System. He also went into greater detail during the teaching with cryptography. Participated in grading. Student Grades Teach Page

KinetekEnergy commented 9 months ago

Period 5 Lopez, Safe Computing Self Evaluation

Aashray R: 0.96

Completed the section about the personal identifiable information and the explanation about what it is. Also completed the list about the different types of PII's and their level of sensitivity. Also wrote most of the popcorn hacks.

Will C: 0.98

Wrote about nefarious uses of the internet. Talked about what viruses are and what they could do. Talked about different viruses and how they act differently to compromise a machine in a different way. Also talked about phishing attacks and what they do.

Yeongsu K: 0.97

Wrote the requirements for what is a good password and precautions you should take so that you don't compromise your system and good practices to employ for passwords and overall security.

Advik G: 1

Wrote the entire section about cryptography. Talked about what is: difference between passwords and keys, types of encryption (symmetric vs asymmetric), examples of algorithms, cryptography demo (live demo about it). Also talked about cryptography with the Alice and Bob explanation and described public-keys and private-keys. Wrote about SSL and TLS too.

SrijDude3416 commented 9 months ago

P5 Lopez: The Internet

Overall Individual Ratings: Srijan Atti: 0.915/1 Ian Wu: 0.935/1 Ryan Liu: 0.905/1 Hayden Chen: 0.925/1

Individual Engagement Ratings: Preface: All group members equally graded submissions. Submissions were distributed such that each group member got ~8-9 students and gave comments on each student.

Srijan Atti: 0.44/0.50 Created content for the HTTP/HTTPS model as well as created the homework questions. Also used Wireshark to demonstrate packets and network protocols in action. Ian Wu: 0.46/0.50 Distributed responsibility for the team teach and created the content for the OSI Model, the TCP/IP Model, and Protocols. Ryan Liu: 0.43/0.50 Created all popcorn hacks as well as content on IP addresses. Hayden Chen: 0.45/0.50 Researched and created content regarding TCP, TCP handshakes, UDP, and their differences.

Overall Logistics with Teacher Team Rating: 0.475/0.5 Lessons posted and comments (0.18): Link to blog Link to graded submissions with comments and links to submissions

Grading complete and on time (0.20): Texted Mr. Lopez with the grade spreadsheet, through slack on Tuesday, December 19th. Also verifiable through edit log history of the google spreadsheet. Image

Elements of creativity or success (0.095): Our blog post was pretty creative and we were able to use Wireshark to give our audience a visual representation of packets traveling through a network.

vynx1 commented 9 months ago

Grades:

Pranavi: 0.475/0.50

Tanvi: 0.47/0.50

Tarun: 0.475/0.50

Shubhay: 0.47/0.50

Tanay: 0.475/0.50

Work

Pranavi: Was an amazing help to making a teaching schedule that made sense and easily conincided with the college board lessons. Was able to oversee and analyze the work we all needed to do and how we were doing as a team.

Tanvi: Was really helpful in finding important examples for the lesson and involved different topics like video games and the impact ages and genders have on the Internet. Overall she was crucial to improving the quality of the lesson and make it more than just a copy of college boards lesson.

Tarun: Helped debug a lot of the code errors we got and helped actually determine if the code we were doing was proper. In design he helped with the markdown styling and added in some unique features we never even knew existed.

Tanay: Was a overall all rounder and was able to help in every single field and helped every person do their jobs and was able to ensure teamwork and a good work habit in this team teach.

Shubhay: Helped alot for the design of various sections. Thought about what would be entertaining and helpful to learn from past experiences in listening to team teaches. Aided in code, and helped alot in the last portion of the presentation. Overall a team player and allowed for the work to go smoothly and free of errors.

IshanCornick commented 9 months ago

Period 2

Ishan: 0.95

Akshay: 0.95

Nitin 0.96:

Saaithvik 0.97:

anikabhatnagar20 commented 9 months ago

Period 2 Digital Divide Self Evaluation: Anika got .94 Abdullah got a .94 Alisha got a .95 Sergi got a .97 Vance got a .97

Vance R(.97): Constructed majority of the team teach, was a really efficient worker, and a helpful teammate whenever anyone had an question. Sergi S(.97): Graded the homework, helped out with working on popcorn hacks and effects of digital divide. Alisha H (.95): Did research to get comfortable and knowledgable in the variations of digital divide, she was helpful with any questions anyone else had. Abdullah K(.94): Focused on assigning homework, did extra research and was able to find a helpful Stanford article diving deeper into the topic of digital divide. Anika B(.94): I tried to focus on working on the 1st popcorn hack and learning about the international disparities of digital divide. Overall as a group we all worked together and communicated efficiently and were able to deliver a lesson on digital divide to the class.

ak146 commented 9 months ago

Period 2

David Lee: 0.98

Lesson posted 0.20 Researched topic Watched college board videos Best presenter/speaker Grading Completed: 0.18 Helped assist with difficult grades Elements of creativity: 0.1 made the most entertaining example out of the lesson. helped make popcorn hacks and homework

Matthew: 0.98

Lesson posted: 0.20 watched college board videos knew the topic well and presented well Grading Completed: 0.18 Helped assist with difficult grades Elements of creativity: 0.1 helped make a majority of the popcorn hacks and helped make homework

Kayden Le 0.96:

Lesson posted 0.19 Watched college board videos made the third section of the lesson Grading completed: 0.19 helped at the start to grade the lessons and double checked. Elements of creativity: 0.1 helped make popcorn hacks and homework

Andrew(me) 0.94 Lesson posted 0.18 Watched college board videos Wrote the summary Grading completed 0.2 Graded majority of the homework elements of creativity/success: 0.09 not a good speaker cookies (David's part)

Tanvi-3 commented 9 months ago

Period 5 Lopez

Self Evaluation: (0.96) Pranavi: took notes based on collegeboard video and thought of key aspects to include in lesson (0.95) Tanay: helped make the section of the introduction and real world examples regarding that area (0.97) Tanvi: took notes based on collegeboard video and focused on unintentional and inteltional biases and graded homework (0.96)Tarun: Popcorn hacks and types of computing biases section (0.97) Shubey: Worked on the ai implication section along with homework hacks

Lin-cT commented 9 months ago

P5: Lopez Crowdsourcing

Self Evaluation:

Lindsay (0.98/1): Did extra research outside of College Board on crowdsourcing. Defined crowdsourcing, researched different types of crowdsourcing, and created part of homework hacks.

Anika (0.98/1): I took notes on the full College Board videos as well as other places like Fiveable. I also created paragraphs about public data sets, distributed computing, and innovations made possible through crowdsourcing with examples for each.

Samhita : (0.94/1): I wasn’t able to present because I lost my voice, however, I helped with creating popcorn and homework hacks and grading. I also researched the College Board videos and other articles.

Grace : (0.95/1): I researched through the College Board videos on crowdsourcing and worked on the popcorn hacks. Helped with homework hacks and homework grading.

Individual/Team Engagement Rating:

Lindsay:

Anika:

Samhita:

Grace:

Logistics With Teacher:

Lesson Posted and Comments (0.18): Verifiable through teacher repo and Slack. Grading Complete and on Time (0.2): Verifiable through Slack. Elements of Creativity or Success (0.094): We had pictures that were engaging with the audience, as well as some popcorn hacks to make sure the audience understood the topic. We also packed in a lot of information within the teaching, as we added stuff from AP Classroom as well as extra outside information.

sharonkodali commented 9 months ago

Period 2- Beneficial and Harmful Effects

Tara Sehdave 0.98

Peyton Leigh 0.98

Ameer Hussain 0.92:

Sharon (me) 0.98

Student Homework Grades

will-w-cheng commented 8 months ago

Period 5 Lopez, Safe Computing Self Evaluation

Aashray R: 0.95 Talked about PII list and completed the list about the different types of PII's and their level of sensitivity. Also wrote most of the popcorn hacks.

Will C: 0.94

Talked about different malware and viruses and the different ways they can take entry into the system. Also included a small backdoor demo within to a victim's machine.

Yeongsu K: 0.95

Talked about passwords and the importance of compliance rules that are crucial for securing accounts on the system. Also included a small extra credit feature for homework.

Advik G: 1

Covered a huge part of cryptography and the differences between public and private keys. Also talked about symmetric and asymmetric encryptions and included a section for TLS and SSL layers.

advikg commented 8 months ago

Period 5 Lopez, Safe Computing Self Evaluation

Aashray: 0.94 finished the segment on personally identifiable information (PII), detailing its definition and importance. Additionally, I compiled a comprehensive list outlining the various types of PII and their respective sensitivity levels. Moreover, I contributed significantly to the content covering the popcorn hacks.

Will: 0.96 covered the darker side of the internet, exploring nefarious activities. Discussed viruses, their capabilities, various types, and how they exploit systems differently. Explained phishing attacks and their methods of operation.

Yeongsu: 1 Composed the criteria for a strong password and the necessary precautions to safeguard your system, along with recommended practices to enhance password security and overall system safety. Helped a lot with structuring the lesson and taking initiative.

Advik: 0.99

Wrote the whole part covering cryptography. Discussed the contrast between passwords and keys, the two main encryption types (symmetric and asymmetric), provided instances of algorithms, demonstrated cryptography in action (live demo included). Used and Alice and Bob illustration to explain public-keys and private-keys. Delved into SSL and TLS, used certbot as an example of using certificates in CSP.

Student Grades Teach Page

tarasehdave commented 8 months ago

Period 2- Beneficial and Harmful Effects

Overall team score: 0.96

Sharon Kodali 1/1 She started the presentation and spoke about the first video. She also helped grade the submissions and did the amount of graders she was supposed to. She also helped other members in the group with grading. Good popcorn hack.

Tara Sehdave 0.95/1 I did my presentation based off the final video in our topic. I added external research and examples to my presentation. I graded the correct amount of submissions. Good popcorn hack.

Peyton Leigh 0.95/1 Completed his presentation on time and off the video he was assigned. Had a good presentation. Was generally very collaborative. Good popcorn hack and understanding of topic.

Ameer Hussain 0.92/1 Completed prior research and watched the college board videos. Understood topic and presented well with accurate information. Did not help with grading submissions.

Student Homework Grades

Akhil353 commented 8 months ago

P1: Undecided Problems Team Akhil S, Kyle L, Shuban P, Aashray R

Self Evaluation: Akhil S (Me): 0.49 I helped create 2 of the three popcorn hacks along with the homework. I also revised the main content that was discussed during the lesson and helped with grading. I did a lot of work to create the homework, but I believe the clearness of the homework and my presenting skills could be better.

Kyle L: 0.50 Kyle helped make most of the content for the teaching, and made it clear what an undecidable problem was.

Shuban P N/A: Shuban was absent for most of the time we were creating the HW, but he still came back in time to help with grading and presenting.

Aashray R: 0.48 Aashray helped a lot with creating the popcorn hacks and also helped a little with the grading, but overall, I think we ran out of things to do, which left Aashray with not a lot to do.

Student Grading Lesson

M8tth3 commented 8 months ago

Period 2 - Computer Bias Overall Grades: Lakshanya: 0.47 + 0.18 + 0.2 + 0.09 = 0.94 Trevor: 0.47 + 0.18 + 0.2 + 0.09 = 0.94 Hanlun: 0.47 + 0.18 + 0.2 + 0.09 = 0.94 Matthew: 0.46 + 0.18 + 0.2 + 0.09 = 0.93 Aditya: 0.47 + + 0.18 + 0.2 + 0.09 = 0.94

Individual Engagement Rating:

Lakshanya (0.47/0.50) Wrote and explained Implicit vs Explicit Data Participated greatly in the grading process with well-thought-out comments and reasonable scoring Created Popcorn Hack #3

Trevor Huang (0.47/0.50) Wrote and covered all of the types of computer bias Did extra research outside of the college board Worked on popcorn hack #2 Participated in the grading process Handed out high-fives to maintain engagement because Trevor's hi-fives are the best

Hanlun Li (0.47/0.50) Did the lesson intro define what computer bias was at the start Came up with popcorn hack #1 Created homework problem Participated in the grading process

Matthew Wakayama (0.46/0.50) Discussed and wrote about Mitigation Strategies for Computer Bias Participated in the grading process Organized the structure of the lesson and the .ipynb file

Aditya Desai (0.47/0.50) Expanded on the ways that mitigation strategies are implemented in the different processing stages Did extra research outside of the college board for clarification on certain topics Participated in the grading process Closed out the presentation

Logistics with teacher:

Lessons posted and comments (0.18) The lesson was posted on the Nighthawk teacher portfolio page and we had everyone submit their assignment through utterance comments. Grading Complete on time (0.2) Student Grades, submitted on December 17, 10:29 PM image Lesson Creativity (0.09/1) Was a fairly standard team teacher. However, we worked to keep the attention of the audience with creative rewards for participation such as Trevor's high-fives.

aashrayr commented 8 months ago

P1: Undecided Problems Team Akhil S, Kyle L, Shuban P, Aashray R

Self Evaluation: Aashray R (Me): 0.49 I helped create popcorn hacks along with the homework, and also assisted with some of the concepts, however since our section was slightly smaller, I was left with little to do in the end.

Kyle L: 0.50 Watched lots of the videos and did outside research, and also assisted in providing us with key concepts.

Shuban P N/A: Absent for the creation process, however did help in presenting.

Akhil S: 0.49 Assisted with lots of the popcorn hacks and concepts, and was also able to answer the questions that were asked in the class.

Student Grades Student Grading

spooketti commented 8 months ago

Period 5 Lopez: Routing and Computing

Overall Ratings:

Deva Sasikumar: 0.965/1 Also worked on 4.3 with notes on parallel computing, distributed computing, and sequential computing. Prepared the planning on who will say what in the presentation. Helped contribute to grading, and also researched applications of the types of computing.

Sri Surapaneni 0.97/1 Worked on presenting fault tolerance systems and diagrams, focused on 4.2 video 1, explained how redundacy and network travelling works, helped create the notebook a little, added popcorn hacks and images, helped contribute to grading

Soham Kulkarni 0.965/1 Worked on presenting fault tolerance solutions and explaining how it facilitates data, focused on 4.2 video 2, worked on the notebook a little and added popcorn hacks and images, helped contribute to grading

Jonathan Liu: 0.97/1 Worked on parallel computing, distributed computing, and sequential computing, 4.3's lesson. Worked on coding the website and explained the differences in nuance between the run time, applications, and when is the best use case for each type of computing. Helped contribute to grading

Logistics with Teacher Team Rating: 0.47/0.5 Lessons posted and comments (0.18): Link to the lesson

Link to the grades and comments we had on their work

Grading complete and on time (0.2): Texted the grade spreadsheet, through Slack on December 12th. Can also be verified through the spreadsheet version history. Image

Elements of creativity or success (0.09): Our blog post was creative and successful as it has built-in answer and reveal buttons, animations as users scroll into the web page, and also credits to the people who wrote their sections in author lines.

liangkyle08 commented 8 months ago
  1. Kyle (.49) - I was the one who watched the CB videos on our topic and transferred the information to our Jupyter Notebook.
  2. Aashray (.48) - Aashray created the some of the popcorn hacks for our teach and also added additional information from the internet to supplement our teach.
  3. Akhil (.49) - Akhil created the rest of the popcorn hacks as well as the homework hacks.
  4. Shuban (N/A) - Shuban was sick during the time we prepared for the team teach. However, he was still able to present on the actual day of the teach.

The four of us presented for an equal amount of time.

Homework Grading

Lesson on Teacher Blog

shuban-789 commented 8 months ago

i. Kyle (.49) - Transferred topics from colllegeboard videos onto the notebook ii. Aashray (.48) - Created popcorn hacks for ur notebook iii. Akhil (.49) - Created homework hacks iv. Shuban (N/A) - I was mostly sick for this. I was knocked out level sick as in I could not get out of my bed. There was nothing I could do to help.

The four of us presented for an equal amount of time and I was able to learn what I was presenting fairly quickly.

RonitT1234 commented 8 months ago

P1: Beneficial and Harmful Effects Team

Imaad: 0.49/0.5 - Created initial layout for team teaching. Wrote about the beneficial and Harmful Effects in detail providing lots of description. Played a fundamental role in its creation Ronit: 0.49/0.5 - Wrote and contributed a lot to the Mitigating Risks/Responsibility sections. Also added a section about finding Balance. I also helped add images and format and proofread the entire team teach before we presented it.. Tejas: 0.46/0.5 - I wrote about the many positive and negative effects of dopamine, as well as an example of it. An example was TikTok as it uses dopamine to keep users hooked and engaged. Tarun: 0.47/0.5 - On our Beneficial and Harmful Effects team teach, I contributed to creating the popcorn hacks and the homework questions. I made sure that the questions asked would be most beneficial to the student's learning. I also graded most of the submitted homework and added comments that they could use to improve their responses next time.

Lessons posted and comments: 0.20/0.20 Our lesson was posted on the morning of our teaching on time with a working raw link. Team Teach

Our grading had in-depth comments for each person based on their submissions. Comments

Grading complete and on time: 0.19/020 Our grading accounted for every student and was posted on time on December 19th. We also included a median on the spreadsheet Grading

Elements of creativity or success:: 0.09/0.1 Our team teacher was very creative as we utilized multiple relevant images to help maintain audience attention. We also told stories about real-life people affected by the topic of our team teaching.

brandonso36 commented 8 months ago

Period 1: Ethical and Legal Concerns

Brandon So: 0.95/1

Nihar Gupta: 0.9/1

Marcus Hernandez: 0.91/1

Jayden Chen: 0.98/1

Miguel Villa: 0.94/1

yooanthony commented 8 months ago

Anthony Yoo: 0.46/1 graded almost all of the homeworks, adding different comments for each homework explaining the grading process

Chris Park: 0.46/1 wrote the definition, variations, example, benefits, and drawbacks of crowdsourcing

Aiden Kim: 0.47/1 created popcorn hacks and homework questions. Also created the citizen science section of our team teach and also helped grade the homework and left comments.

Rayane Souissi: 0.46/0.5 graded a few of the homeworks, wrote some of the descriptions for the popcorn hacks

Ethan Rahmat: 0.46/0.5 helped with information and descriptions, helped with layout

Team Teach: 0.45/5

Lesson Posted and comments: 0.18/0.2 Team Teach Link posted on time with raw link

Grading Complete and on Time 0.18/0.2 Spreadsheet Link grading complete on time and into overall spreadsheet

Element of Creativity and Success: 0.09/0.1 popcorn hacks and homework questions prompted in depth thinking and responses that applied topics of team teach to real world

peytonl11098 commented 8 months ago

Period 2- Beneficial and Harmful Effects

Overall team score: 0.94

Sharon Kodali 0.96/1 She started the presentation and spoke about the first video. She also helped grade the submissions and did the amount of grades she was supposed to. She also helped other members of the group with grading. Added good popcorn hack.

Tara Sehdave 0.94/1 She did her presentation based on the final video on our topic. She added external research and examples to her presentation. She also graded the correct amount of submissions. That's a good popcorn hack. Good job on the presentation and adding her knowledge to the team teaching.

Peyton Leigh 0.96/1 I Completed my presentation on time and from both the videos on College Board. I had an engaging presentation, asking about my popcorn hacks and telling the audience how our topic directly related to them. I was generally very collaborative. Good popcorn hack and understanding of the topic. Also helped with some of the grading.

Ameer Hussain 0.90/1 He watched College Board videos and did expansive research on any questions he had on the topic. Added some to the lesson and did a good job of presenting and engaging with the classroom. Could have been more communicative, but he did his portion of the work and graded some of the students.

MEERIE commented 8 months ago

Period 2 Beneficial & Harmful Effects: Self Evaluation: Ameer: 0.89 Sharon: 0.98 Tara: 0.94 Peyton: 0.97

Tara Sehdave

Did extra research on her topic other than the college board videos very well-informed on her section Good popcorn hacks Helped with grading and made detailed comments

Peyton Leigh

Very good presentation had a lot of information on his topic Good popcorn hacks very detailed presentation contributed a lot to the grading and collaboration

Ameer Hussain Presentation was detailed and included all concepts from college board videos Wrote scripts/pointers to go off of in the presentation Completed my section of research and helped with popcorn hacks didnt' work on grading, should have contributed more here Sharon

Made the homework google form and helped a lot with grading Worked on assigning everyone different parts of the team teach and focused on making sure collaboration was smooth Worked on my part of presentation but could have been slightly more detailed

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vZY3BQdEJpcXKdx88Xx-8H-IfxTm6BiB2v_k1QyVElc/edit#gid=0 https://nighthawkcoders.github.io/teacher_portfolio//2023/12/05/CSP-5.1-beneficial_IPYNB_2_.html

LincolnC2008 commented 8 months ago

Period 2: Routing and Computing

Ashwin V: 0.97/1. Ashwin did all of the second half of the lesson plus some popcorn hacks by watching the CB videos on computing. presented on computing.

Lincoln C: 0.95/1. Lincoln did most of the routing part of the team teach by doing all of the first half of it and helping Gurshawn think of popcorn hacks for his part. Presented the first part of routing.

Gurshawn B: 0.93/1. He did second half of the routing one with Lincoln's help. Presented second half of routing

Dante: 0.91/1. He did the homework and grading of the homework but little on the actual lesson. Presented all pop-hacks and homework.

Team Teach Grades

ninaadkiran commented 8 months ago

Period 4: Safe Computing

Ninaad Kiran: 0.96/1. First lesson including a lot of outside research regarding laws about certain information being released to websites and individuals.

Josh Thinh: 0.94/1. Created the third lesson about risk factors in safe computing and created one of the popcorn hacks.

Daniel Lee: 0.92/1.0 Made creative popcorn hacks and did research about our topic to create the homework

Ethan Hong: 0.94 Created notes and lesson based on the second video including a popcorn hack and examples using outside research and examples of past examples

Team Teach Grades

dino596 commented 8 months ago

Period 4 Routing and Computing

Nikki H: 1/1 - helped a lot with the overal jupyter notebook design and organized most of the content into the jupyter notebook

Eun L: 1/1 - organized all the information of the college board videos into a google doc, which was later used as the content of our teaching

Arthur L: 1/1 - helped come up with the popcorn hacks and the homework

Patrick H: 0.96/1 - polished the notebook and prepared for the team teach

Team Teach Grades

katelync05 commented 8 months ago

Period 4: Legal and Ethical Concerns

Ellie Rozenkrants: 0.95/1 Took notes on the Collegeboard videos and did extra research, helped with creating the homework

Katelyn Chen: 0.97/1 Combined notes from Ellie and Ishraq and created lesson plan as well as homework and popcorn hacks

Tajrian Masum: 0.92/1 Answered questions during presentation and graded homework

Ishraq Hossain: 0.96/1 Took notes on Collegeboard videos and did additional research, helped creating homework and popcorn hacks (made presentation engaging)

TeamTeach Grading

AidanLau10 commented 8 months ago

Period 1: The Internet

Aidan Lau: 0.48/0.5:

Srinivas Nampalli: 0.47/0.5:

Tanav Kambhampati: 0.47/0.5:

Anvay Yadav: 0.47/0.5:

Teacher notes:

Lesson Posted and comments: 0.2/0.2 The Internet

Grading Complete and on Time 0.2/0.2 Spreadsheet

Element of Creativity and Success: 0.09/0.1

AnvayYadav commented 8 months ago

Period 1: The Internet

Aidan Lau: 0.48/0.5:

Created content for all of video 2 Formatted the notebook with highlights, images, and buttons to reveal popcorn hack answers

Srinivas Nampalli: 0.46/0.5:

Created content for part 1 of the video

Introduced the start of the team teach

Tanav Kambhampati: 0.45/0.5:

Spoke the hardest part(explaining example of process of data being transferred through internet by TCP/IP model)

Graded Homeworks

Anvay Yadav: 0.48/0.5:

Created popcorn and homework hacks Graded Homeworks Added images

Teacher notes:

Tanav and Aidan had good enunciation Aidan and Srini work on projection Anvay focus on being clearer

Lesson Posted and comments: 0.2/0.2

The Internet

Lesson is live and includes Utterance comments for homework submissions Raw wget link was given at the start of the lesson

Grading Complete and on Time 0.2/0.2

Spreadsheet

Spreadsheet is formatted and clean that includes comments

Grading is completed on time

Element of Creativity and Success: 0.09/0.1

Popcorn hack answers are shown by using buttons to reveal the answer Important and key words are highlighted to emphasize learning them Examples are shown using images to engage the audience Popcorn hacks make the student think critically and apply to the real world

tanav-kambhampati commented 8 months ago

Period 1: The Internet

Aidan Lau: 0.48/0.5: Created most of the content for the notebook except for the first video Formatted the notebook with highlights and buttons to reveal popcorn hacks

Srinivas Nampalli: 0.47/0.5: Created content for the first collegeboard video Introduced the beginning of the team teach

Tanav Kambhampati: 0.47/0.5: Spoke the hardest part(explaining example of process of data being transferred through internet by TCP/IP model) Graded half of the class Went over homework at the end.

Anvay Yadav: 0.46/0.5: Graded a few people Created popcorn and homework hacks Created a few homework questions

Teacher notes:

Tanav and Aidan had good communication Srini and Anvay should project voices more. Lesson Posted and comments: 0.2/0.2 The Internet

Lesson is live and includes Utterance comments for homework submissions Raw wget link was given at the start of the lesson Grading Complete and on Time 0.2/0.2 Spreadsheet

Spreadsheet is formatted and clean that includes comments

Grading is completed on time

Element of Creativity and Success: 0.089/0.1 Popcorn hack answers are shown by using buttons to reveal the answer Important and key words are highlighted to emphasize learning them Examples are shown using images to engage the audience Popcorn hacks to engage and make the student think critically and apply to the real world

PatrickHastings2 commented 8 months ago

Period 4 Routing and Computing TeamTeach Grade Nikki H: 0.96/1 Nikki designed our Juypter notebook. She organized the content well, making it easy to follow.

Eun L: 0.96/1 Eun organized the college board video info on a Google Doc, which we used to for the teaching, by doing so she helped structure our teachings content.

Arthur L: 0.96/1 Arthur added creativity with popcorn hacks and homework ideas, overall making the project more engaging

Patrick H: 0.93/1 Polished the Jupyter notebook, and added detail to make our project look professional.

SrinivasNampalli commented 8 months ago

Period 1: The Internet

Aidan Lau: 0.48/0.5: Created notes and made sure to stay accurate and cross check with us to verify if information was true. Did most of the final touch's and set up the whole notebook the way he did.

Srinivas Nampalli(ME): 0.47/0.5: Created content for the first college board video Introduced the beginning of the team teach

Tanav Kambhampati: 0.47/0.5:

Spoke a difficult and hard understanding topic that took him a while to even understand himself. TCP/IP was a very hard to communicate topic.

Anvay Yadav: 0.47/0.5: Created homework and had a simple speaking part. Also talked about popcorn hacks and made the lesson more interactive.

Teacher notes:

Tanav and Aidan had good communication Srini and Anvay should project voices more.

The Internet

Lesson is live and includes Utterance comments for homework submissions Raw wget link was given at the start of the lesson Grading Complete and on Time 0.2/0.2 Spreadsheet

Spreadsheet is formatted and clean that includes comments

Grading is completed on time

Element of Creativity and Success: 0.089/0.1 Popcorn hack answers are shown by using buttons to reveal the answer Important and key words are highlighted to emphasize learning them Examples are shown using images to engage the audience Popcorn hacks to engage and make the student think critically and apply to the real world

isabellehp commented 8 months ago

Period 1 Lopez, Computing Bias Lesson file Grades

Self Evaluation Hannah R: 0.95/1

Isabelle P: 0.98/1

Prakruti B: 0.95/1

Vidha Y: 0.96/1

KaiyuSugiyama commented 8 months ago

Kaiyu Sugiyama: 0.98/1 -Did the homework hack -Described microtransactions and give an example -Watched the college board videos -Graded hw

Jared Baza: 0.97/1 -Focused on AI portion -Beneficial and harmful effects of AI

Drishsya Mody: 0.97/1 -Focused on the internet -Beneficial and harmful effects of AI

Aidan Delgado: 0.98/1 -Coded the example of the beneficial and harmful code -Watched the college board video

Homework grading: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LF-FoDNyJSXIlbYuDA2atLwGPm2Lp_e7buDa2LfTQHg/edit#gid=0

Lesson file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DrishyaMody/DJAKTri2/main/_notebooks/2023-12-05-Benefitial_and_Harmful.ipynb

AdiBricks commented 8 months ago

P5 The Digital Divide Team Grades

0.97 Aditya Ramesh: Main Factors, Background, Key Concepts, Solutions, and Grading 0.94 Aditya Samavedam: Analysis, Examples, Fun Facts 0.94 Gavin Dyke: Affects and Solutions 0.96 Sai Tailsetty: Homework and Grading

Student Grades: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-__iNzhJ3_ea-vOn1JjCOdPNwMFnnd2IqHGS5-_0GrE/edit#gid=0 Link to Team Teach: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdityaSamavedam/student2/main/_notebooks/2023-12-05-Digital-Divide.ipynb

srivaidyas commented 8 months ago

P4 The Internet Teach Team Peer Grades

Austin Z: 0.94 Layer 1, Fun Facts Cayden Shi: 0.94 Layer 4, Popcorn Hacks Saaras K: 0.98 Layer 3, Created homework Eric Yu: 0.98 Real Life Examples, Layer 2 Sri Vaidyanathan S: 0.95 Grading, TCP vs UDP

Student Grades: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cB6JNFGih0o3ZjFN-6e4mq1YFxgJ-UZQ5OjpenGEFfI/edit#gid=0 Link to Team Teach: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/srivaidyas/student2.0/main/_notebooks/2023-11-28-InternetLesson.ipynb

jntpham commented 8 months ago

P4 Undecidable Problems

Karam: 0.96

Team Teach: https://nighthawkcoders.github.io/teacher_portfolio//2023/12/06/P4_Undecidable_Problems_IPYNB_2_.html Grading Sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IxQfbjPTNK9zPWOKhyno9hSiayv430yFonfBWOo2BAM/edit#gid=0

Lin-cT commented 8 months ago

Lindsay (0.97/1): Did extra research outside of College Board on crowdsourcing. Defined crowdsourcing, researched different types of crowdsourcing, and created part of homework hacks.

Anika (0.98/1): I took notes on the full College Board videos as well as other places like Fiveable. I also created paragraphs about public data sets, distributed computing, and innovations made possible through crowdsourcing with examples for each.

Samhita : (0.94/1): I wasn’t able to present because I lost my voice, however, I helped with creating popcorn and homework hacks and grading. I also researched the College Board videos and other articles.

Grace : (0.95/1): I researched through the College Board videos on crowdsourcing and worked on the popcorn hacks. Helped with homework hacks and homework grading.

Logistics With Teacher:

Lesson Posted and Comments (0.18): Verifiable through teacher repo and Slack. Grading Complete and on Time (0.2): Verifiable through Slack. Elements of Creativity or Success (0.094): We had pictures that were engaging with the audience, as well as some popcorn hacks to make sure the audience understood the topic. We also packed in a lot of information within the teaching, as we added stuff from AP Classroom as well as extra outside information.

JasonGuan1012 commented 8 months ago

Period 1, Mr. Lopez, Fault-Tolerance

Self-Evaluation

Aaron H: 0.95 / 1 , Keeping good communication in the team. Provided popcorn hacks. Grading partial homework. Provided explicit facts about Fault Tolerance.

Ryan L: 0.98 / 1 , Keeping good communication in the team. Provided popcorn hacks. Grading partial homework. Contributed the most in the team teaching such as coding the most knowledge in the Fault Tolerance lesson.

Jason G: 0.94.5 / 1 , Keeping good communication in the team. Provided popcorn hacks. Grading partial homework. Didn't really contribute a lot compared to other teammates since working on the CPT theme etc...

Grading sheet

Lesson