search

nightstyles / alembic

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/alembic
Other
1 stars 0 forks source link

Write Alembic Python Bindings #104

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This ticket needs more detail, just creating tasks.

Our initial and possibly dumb assumption would be that ILM would probably start 
working on this.

Not knowing for sure, we can discuss and change this at any time. Feel free to 
change this ticket as needed.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ard...@gmail.com on 16 Nov 2010 at 11:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ard...@gmail.com on 16 Nov 2010 at 11:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ard...@gmail.com on 17 Nov 2010 at 6:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ard...@gmail.com on 17 Nov 2010 at 6:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by scottmmo...@gmail.com on 20 Nov 2010 at 2:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
just changing this to work order 3 real quick to fall in line after 1 and 2.

Original comment by scottmmo...@gmail.com on 2 Dec 2010 at 2:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ard...@gmail.com on 4 Dec 2010 at 4:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
If it's okay, just changing this to 'in progress.'

Original comment by scottmmo...@gmail.com on 8 Dec 2010 at 12:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Right now, most of the Abc layer, on the 'I' side, is wrapped.  This allows one 
to open an Alembic Archive and examine its structure (object and property 
hierarchy), which is useful for a lot of stuff.  For various reasons, we want 
to defer providing bindings that allow you to get at sampled values in an 
Alembic Archive, and for the same various reasons, we want to defer providing 
bindings for the 'O' side.

See 
http://code.google.com/r/ardent-embic/source/browse?r=python#hg%2Fpython%2Falemb
ic for what we currently have.

Original comment by ard...@gmail.com on 18 Jan 2011 at 11:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I've been playing with the bindings so far and with the limitations noted in 
comment #8 I think the rest of it is looking pretty good.

Original comment by stephan....@gmail.com on 19 Jan 2011 at 12:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Just noting that we need to talk with RnD about effort needed to add the 
python-ilmbase math bindings for pythong into OpenEXR.

Original comment by ble...@gmail.com on 7 Jul 2011 at 10:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ble...@gmail.com on 7 Jul 2011 at 10:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Internal PyIMath bindings in pretty good shape. To be open sourced (and some 
merging with coretex api) soon.

Original comment by ble...@gmail.com on 24 Aug 2011 at 11:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by miller.lucas on 24 Jan 2012 at 1:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Another option for an open source python Imath binding you should consider is 
this one - http://code.google.com/p/pimath/ - it's probably the most complete 
Python binding available for imath - and even corrects for inconsistencies in 
the C++ original code.

Original comment by evolutio...@gmail.com on 16 Feb 2012 at 12:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Python bindings are in the newly released 1.1

Original comment by miller.lucas on 2 Aug 2012 at 11:14