Open noobtoob4lyfe opened 4 years ago
Anyone have any ideas about what's happening here, or what I might be able to do to improve? Thanks!
Have you tried -t 2048
Thanks for the reply. Yes, i did try a number of different values there including 2048 and it did not improve things.
I think this should be a problem with the CAIN algorithm
It is recommended to use rife-ncnn-vulkan instead of cain-ncnn-vulkan
Thanks. I will try that
well - RIFE is NOT the new CAIN.
CAIN does things different and is much less VRAM hungry.
I hope there will be a working CAIN soon again.
This looks very promising... https://github.com/google-research/frame-interpolation/
I'm really enjoying playing with this software. Thanks for making it available!
I'm noticing that it works really well on details and features that move over a small percentage of the screenspace from one frame to the next.
However, I'm also noticing that it seems to freak out when there are pan and tilt motions of the camera that exceed a certain amount of degrees per frame. See here for an example. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BPvVEIK1u1ngv9607tWEOm-vGNmr-Xug/view?usp=sharing I find this strange because cheap traditional optical flow frame interpolation has no problem with this same shot.
Is this something that can modified in the code to fix? I've tried basically every window size and nothing seems to help. Could it possibly be trained handle these kind of camera moves better? Thanks in advance!