The older power flow models in the test folder need some clean up.
All of them are using the ID number for connections, some use numbers for names, and most are using voltage_A (even if there is not a phase A) rather than nominal_voltage.
These all need to be cleaned up to match our current power flow standard syntax to avoid confusion.
nikhilgupta10 imported these comments from Sourceforge:
The user dchassin does not exist anymore. Therefore assigning this to afisher1.
Description has changed:
Diff:
status: new --> assigned
assigned_to: Jason Fuller --> Matt Engels
Milestone: Unscheduled --> Version 3.2 RC1
Resolution: --> none
Component: Powerflow --> none
Priority: minor --> major
,
This should be done in all models using powerflow (whether in the powerflow folder or not) in branches 3.0 and newer, and trunk.,
The older power flow models in the test folder need some clean up.
All of them are using the ID number for connections, some use numbers for names, and most are using voltage_A (even if there is not a phase A) rather than nominal_voltage.
These all need to be cleaned up to match our current power flow standard syntax to avoid confusion.
,