nikita21 / ndt

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/ndt
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Send Buffer size displayed in the statistics window is not matching #7

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?

1. Connect server and client in a 1GBit Switch
2. Start both servers (fakewww and web100)
3. Set the following tcp paramters in both server and client.
   Server
    echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_moderate_rcvbuf
    echo 4194304 > /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max
    echo 4194304 > /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
    echo "4096 87380 4194304" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem
    echo "4096 32768 32768" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
    echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
    echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
    echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
    echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn

   Client
    echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_moderate_rcvbuf
    echo 4194304 > /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max
    echo 4194304 > /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
    echo "4096 87380 4194304" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem
    echo "4096 16384 4194304" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
    echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
    echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
    echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
    echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn

4. Click the start button to start the test and wait till client complete
the test.
5. Check the statistics window.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
When promting the send buffer size problem current size of the send buffer
should be displayed.
But statistics window is displaying the send buffer size as 16K with is not
correct. In the more details page NDT server send buffer size X_Sendbuf
values is displayed correctly 32768 (32K)

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
NDT server 3.6.0 
Client : Linux (Ubuntu 9)

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by sekharn...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2010 at 1:26

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by sekharn...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2010 at 1:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by sekharn...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2010 at 1:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Removing the 'Priority' tag and replacing with a 'Severity' tag.  Un-assigning 
QA team as owner of the bug.

Original comment by jwzuraw...@gmail.com on 1 Mar 2010 at 12:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jwzuraw...@gmail.com on 10 Mar 2010 at 8:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Re-verified with V3.6.3 and this bug is not valid. Since we modified test case 
to change only client buffer sizes this bug is not reproduced.

Original comment by sekharn...@gmail.com on 10 Jun 2010 at 5:29