Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
i did try changing all of my service nodes in web.config to include port 8500
but the webservice proxies still do not like it.
Original comment by venusian...@gmail.com
on 29 Jul 2012 at 8:52
You most likely have to use the <baseAddress> in WCF bindings.
Original comment by omaralzabir@gmail.com
on 29 Jul 2012 at 9:09
<add baseAddress="http://localhost:8500/dropthings" />
doesn't work.
I entered that for each of the 3 baseAddresses plus the webroot key.
Are you saying that it should work? Or, am i not entering them in the right
place?
Watching any of the Olympics out there?
Original comment by venusian...@gmail.com
on 29 Jul 2012 at 11:22
I remember now that I had the same problem and I ended up creating a new
subdomain mapped to a new website in IIS to host the services. I created
another website, pointing to the same code folder.
Original comment by omaralzabir@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 1:00
Ok, i tried that. Changed all the baseAddresses to reflect the virtual
directory name that i'm using along with the port number (8105).
Still getting the same error (500), again, from the alternate port usage.
Original comment by venusian...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 3:18
Still playing around with it and pointing to the same code with a virtual
directory doesn't seem to change things.
Somewhere must be hardwired to only use port 80?
Original comment by venusian...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 3:46
Virtual Directory won't work. You need a new top level website mapped to a new
subdomain.
Original comment by omaralzabir@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 3:54
Just noticed, if your ISP is blocking port 80, then can't you just remove the
port 80 (default) binding and have only the 8500 binding on IIS?
Original comment by omaralzabir@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 3:55
wow, that worked!
i do have other web projects, like dotnetnuke sites, that now won't work until
i assign them all port 8105 aliases (that run on that same box).
good thinking, Omar. I can at least proceed with this for now.
Original comment by venusian...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 3:59
wonder why additional bindings throws it off?
Original comment by venusian...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 4:00
WCF limitation
Original comment by omaralzabir@gmail.com
on 31 Jul 2012 at 10:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
venusian...@gmail.com
on 29 Jul 2012 at 7:07