add dotnet top level statements

[PauloCotrim]

using System.IO;

var data = String.Empty;

try { data = File.ReadAllText("rounds.txt", System.Text.Encoding.UTF8); } catch (IOException err) { Console.WriteLine($"Couldn't read file:\n {err.Message}"); }

int rounds = int.Parse(data.Replace("\n", "").Replace("\r", ""));

double pi = 1; double x = 1;

for (int i = 2; i < rounds + 2; i++) { x = -1; pi += (x / (2 i - 1)); }

pi *= 4; Console.WriteLine(pi);

[niklas-heer]

@PauloCotrim thank you for your contribution. So what you wrote as a comment is that C# .Net code?

[PauloCotrim]

@PauloCotrim thank you for your contribution. So what you wrote as a comment is that C# .Net code?

Yes. Sorry.

[niklas-heer]

@PauloCotrim ah okay. Thank you. Do you know which docker image is best to use for this and how best to build/run this code? (the commands)

(I found this on Docker Hub)

[niklas-heer]

I also don't know when I will be able to dive into C# to make that work. If you could contribute a pull-request which contains all the components to make it work, that would be great!

You can put your source file into src/leibniz.cs. Then you could add the commands and docker image to make it run to the Earthfile.

Here is an example from Java:

java:
  # Using a dedicated image due to the packages on alpine being not up to date.
  FROM eclipse-temurin:19_36-jdk-alpine
  COPY ./src/rounds.txt ./
  COPY +build/scbench ./

  COPY ./src/leibniz.java ./
  RUN --no-cache javac leibniz.java
  # TODO: Change scbench to be able to handle Java version. For now it's static.
  # $ java -version
  # openjdk version "19" 2022-09-20
  # OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-19+36 (build 19+36)
  # OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-19+36 (build 19+36, mixed mode, sharing)
  RUN --no-cache ./scbench "java leibniz" -i $iterations -l "echo 19.36" --export json --lang "Java"
  SAVE ARTIFACT ./scbench-summary.json AS LOCAL ./results/java.json

To run it on your machine, you need Docker and earthly installed.

[niklas-heer]

I've merged this to get the next branch up to date. But I converted your request into an issue. (#28)