Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
is not a defect... sorry !
Original comment by leandro....@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2009 at 5:20
I don't expect many people will use 3.0 in production - it's a transitional
release
between 2.9 and 3.1. If I'm wrong, then of course we can roll out a version of
Luke
with Lucene 3.0 .
Original comment by sig...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2009 at 5:24
I've got this error message while using Lucene 3.0 :
Incompatible format version: 2 expected 1 or lower
Original comment by sebastie...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2009 at 10:16
so do i.
Incompatible format version: 2 expected 1 or lower
Original comment by Bihang.C...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2009 at 10:02
Its a great tool - even for testing transitional releases... I'd be thankfull
for a
3.0.0 release of luke!
Original comment by FMitzl...@googlemail.com
on 3 Dec 2009 at 4:35
If it's not too hard to implement it.. Please support Lucene 3.0.0 too. Thanks !
Original comment by geoto...@gmail.com
on 12 Dec 2009 at 8:24
support Lucene 3 please !
Original comment by edri...@gmail.com
on 16 Dec 2009 at 12:01
Yes also need 3.0
Original comment by jasontes...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2009 at 3:00
+1 for 3.0 support. Thanks again for this tool.
Original comment by matta.l...@gmail.com
on 23 Dec 2009 at 5:10
This is now available - thanks for your comments!
Original comment by sig...@gmail.com
on 23 Dec 2009 at 7:48
Original comment by sig...@gmail.com
on 23 Dec 2009 at 7:50
hi, when i index the file and run it in luke 2.9.0 tool it will saying
Incompatible format version: 2 expected 1 or lower
when its indexing and searching in the code .where is the mistake.
why it happens? its mistake of yur tool or my code. please help me
Original comment by free2fly...@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2014 at 12:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
leandro....@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2009 at 5:19